Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 21

Author Topic: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)  (Read 22033 times)

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #90 on: April 17, 2013, 06:40:37 pm »

In Hawaii

The Dominion's representative sat at the table, fully armoured with the Dominion's iconic power armour, softly (For someone inside said power armour.) tapping on the table before speaking up in a deep, mechanical tone.

"Now please tell me, why was this meeting organized in the first place?"
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #91 on: April 17, 2013, 06:47:38 pm »

A computer monitor displaying the face of the Sky Lords' Presiding Officer is here to represent them.

"I--we're not quite sure. We didn't call it. However, I would like to get the meeting started...we have some important work to get to.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

RulerOfNothing

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #92 on: April 17, 2013, 09:04:13 pm »

The Iranian delegation was also sitting at the table.

"While we do not possess knowledge of the motivations of the USSA in setting up this meeting, we have a number of outcomes we would like to see from this gathering. Firstly, and this should be the least controversial, is that we all agree to a non-aggression pact lasting at least 3 years."
Logged

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #93 on: April 17, 2013, 09:11:13 pm »

Spoiler: To The Khan (click to show/hide)
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

kingfisher1112

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #94 on: April 18, 2013, 03:11:01 am »

In Hawaii

The Dominion's representative sat at the table, fully armoured with the Dominion's iconic power armour, softly (For someone inside said power armour.) tapping on the table before speaking up in a deep, mechanical tone.

"Now please tell me, why was this meeting organized in the first place?"
The president, wearing his typical suit, spoke to the power-armoured figure.
" To negotiate pacts, treaties, other such diplomatic actions. We don't want nukes flying again, and we are all major enough to hurt each other badly. Mutual defence is another possibility, as well as trades of natural resources. Technology Is perhaps a bit more touchy, but possible. "
Logged
Quote
I honestly thought this was going to be about veterinarians.
Ermey: 26/4/13

Remuthra

  • Bay Watcher
  • I live once more...
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #95 on: April 18, 2013, 05:01:27 am »

An encrypted radio crackles to life and a disguised voice speaks through it.

Why would we need mutual defense? Defense against what?

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #96 on: April 18, 2013, 06:29:07 am »

"People who don't agree to the treaty?

We think something like this is a good idea.
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

kingfisher1112

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #97 on: April 18, 2013, 08:15:17 am »

An encrypted radio crackles to life and a disguised voice speaks through it.

Why would we need mutual defense? Defense against what?
My I remind you that we are not the only nations in the world. There are even unaligned pieces of land, and raiders. Mutual defence may be on the table, but right now there are more important things to worry about.
Logged
Quote
I honestly thought this was going to be about veterinarians.
Ermey: 26/4/13

Zanzetkuken The Great

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Wizard Dragon
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #98 on: April 18, 2013, 11:03:40 am »

"While we do not possess knowledge of the motivations of the USSA in setting up this meeting, we have a number of outcomes we would like to see from this gathering. Firstly, and this should be the least controversial, is that we all agree to a non-aggression pact lasting at least 3 years."

The general that the Khan sent to the meeting spoke, "As long as this does not interfere with taking control of unoccupied territories, we can agree to this.  We have gotten our revenge upon the Chinese for their strike upon us when our climate shifted for the better."
Logged
Quote from: Eric Blank
It's Zanzetkuken The Great. He's a goddamn wizard-dragon. He will make it so, and it will forever be.
Quote from: 2016 Election IRC
<DozebomLolumzalis> you filthy god-damn ninja wizard dragon

Weirdsound

  • Bay Watcher
  • Whoosh!
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #99 on: April 18, 2013, 11:17:18 am »

The 80-15-5 rep sighs. "Our business is exploiting the wars of others, but if the majority is in favor of a non-aggression pact, we will sign as well."
Logged

Zanzetkuken The Great

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Wizard Dragon
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #100 on: April 18, 2013, 11:36:13 am »

The 80-15-5 rep sighs. "Our business is exploiting the wars of others, but if the majority is in favor of a non-aggression pact, we will sign as well."

The General remembers to speak to this representative when the delegations take a break from the discussions, as well as to relay this information to the Khan.  He then says, "Non-aggression does not mean no conflict.  The Nationless could attack at any time, as well as terrorist groups."
Logged
Quote from: Eric Blank
It's Zanzetkuken The Great. He's a goddamn wizard-dragon. He will make it so, and it will forever be.
Quote from: 2016 Election IRC
<DozebomLolumzalis> you filthy god-damn ninja wizard dragon

Weirdsound

  • Bay Watcher
  • Whoosh!
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #101 on: April 18, 2013, 12:30:35 pm »

"And that is indeed why we are willing to sign."
Logged

Remuthra

  • Bay Watcher
  • I live once more...
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #102 on: April 18, 2013, 12:33:30 pm »

The New Order is not opposed to this, but we harbor concern over the details of this agreement, especially where flow of information is concerned.

GreatWyrmGold

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sane, by the local standards.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #103 on: April 18, 2013, 05:59:30 pm »

"Agreed. The devil is always in the details. What are we talking about--anyone who attacks another gets attacked by everyone else to attack them and gets kicked out of our club, probably in the other order? Stern rebuke for war? What?"
Logged
Sig
Are you a GM with players who haven't posted? TheDelinquent Players Help will have Bay12 give you an action!
[GreatWyrmGold] gets a little crown. May it forever be his mark of Cain; let no one argue pointless subjects with him lest they receive the same.

Taricus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Leaders of a burning World (ICC)
« Reply #104 on: April 19, 2013, 03:10:21 pm »

The Dominion representative yawned inaudibly before speaking up.

"So, I guess logic wins out on the mutual defense pact, right. Now, for the next proposal, I suggest instituting a full ban upon nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and a non-proliferation treaty to go along with that. The punishment for breaking this agreement would be full-scale militray intervention to destroy or seize the offending material.

This proposal agreeable?"
Logged
Quote from: evictedSaint
We sided with the holocaust for a fucking +1 roll
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 21