Conversely, no matter the quality of those things, no one will move in without housing. Having people commission their own houses isn't only a bad idea from a planning perspective--it's impossible for all but the wealthiest of individuals.
Oh, and we're also proposing good housing. Despite what you are implying you believe, people care about good housing.
Housing is easy enough for hard-working burghers to build themselves.
Counter-evidence: Even with a subsidy, good houses are out of reach for most peasants.
I really don't want to talk about this, or snide mentions of the failed economic policy known as Keynesianism, or anything else savoring of modern politics.
Fair enough, but the Keynesian economics was just an amusing parallel. And it hasn't failed significantly worse than any other single policy followed to its "logical" conclusion.
The thing is, we can go through most of the year with an empty treasury. That may change, but for now I prefer an empty treasury and things rolling in as opposed to rolling in gold and things staying empty.
Agreed.
If part of our discussion offends you you are free to ignore it, no one is forcing you to participate in that part of the debate, but don't try to stop others from discussing a possibility they think is valid.
When a story about a medieval country is in danger of slipping into modern themes, we have a right to be a little concerned. Creating a proletarian utopia would be a real immersion-breaker for me in this time setting.
That's your opinion; you're allowed to it and I won't try to change it.
Helping the lower classes a little, yes, but we're in danger of going too far. Much too far. And there are a number of predictable unintended consequences to giving people free housing.
Free? Who said it would be free?
You know what happens when you assume something, right?
Hi
Ummm... Is it too late to join ??
Suggestion game, go nuts.
I agree, we're focusing too much on military.
Oh, and on medieval city planning: A major reason for sprawling, unplanned cities is a lack of centralized planning over the period of growth. Whether due to having multiple, weak, or no planners, some cities just can't get designed. We aren't in that circumstance; Sir Stone is (as the lord of this land) a strong central authority if he chooses to be, and the only probable reason for him to not be overseeing at least the general design of the city is if he's dead. Thus, designing at least the general form of expansion isn't impossible. (It also helps that we're not exactly planning to go from 168 people to 10,000 by the end of next year--slow growth is easier to plan.)