Unvote Theodolus. Looking good so far.
Deathsword:In my defence, considering the points IronyOwl brought up:
I didn't really know wheter or not asking a lot of questions in my first post would be a good thing or not, so I decided to stick with just one question.
When blackmagechill decided to declare himself supicious of my post, I decided to see what I could get out of him by making some wild (by my standards, at least) assumptions.
Going to FoS blackmagechill due to what I said above.
Um. You haven't actually explained what your results were, though. What is it you're suspicious of?
blackmagechill:So, we have Deathsword WIFOMing with very little suspicion of his friends and Chaos Armor going after someone (me) for questioning Deathsword a bit. I'd also like to point out that Chaos Armor is the only person Deathsword questioned, and stated fears about his questions being used against him. Maybe he wanted to question someone he felt comfortable with. On D1 you shouldn't feel comfortable with anyone, unless you're either masons or scum. And there aren't any masons here.
This would probably be better off in accusation form, as that's better suited to refining your suspicions. Right now it seems like you're trying to just suggest to the rest of us that maybe Deathsword and Chaos Armor is the scumteam, which is problematic for two reasons. One, it doesn't really help you gain new information; other than trying to sway others to lynching Deathsword and then Chaos Armor, it doesn't really have any upside versus taking these accusations to him/them directly. Two, it's a pretty weak connection so far, so it's not really a good lynch argument in the first place.
You're also not answering Chaos Armor's question to you. Is that because you feel it's rhetorical, because you have answered it elsewhere, because he's scum and can thus be ignored, or something else?
6.Chaos Armor jumps on me for voting Deathsword, who's only question was on him. After all that flailing, he tried to cover for Deathsword and voted me. That was the nail in the coffin.
Voting someone for something someone else is doing is also fairly dangerous, as it tends to jump to conclusions. Deathsword doesn't need to be scum for Chaos Armor to be scum or act scummily.
Deathsword:Furthermore, blackmagechill seems very defensive, even somwhat angry, when questioned by people other than me, so, for that, he gets my vote.
This would probably be better off in accusation form. As it stands, it's not really doing anything; and what's more, because he's the only one you're questioning, that means you're not doing anything at all at this point. You need to keep doing things.
As for why it's better as an accusation than a statement, an accusation helps you continue to gather information. If you're so absolutely certain that he's scum that you're willing to lynch him, you might want to make a more thorough and compelling case (and it would probably be a bad idea this early on), as well as moving on to try to find his partner. If not, you're probably going to want to continue getting reads off him, which doesn't really happen if you just declare him scum and then sit there.
Fiskav, no questions for anyone else? Who do you currently think is most, second most, least, and second least scummy?