Softballing your scumbuddy much?
When it comes to players with little experience I assume 'stupid retarded newbie move' before 'horrible blatantly scum move.'
I'm not lurking. So how can I be lurking strategically?
So, four content posts in almost a week is normal levels of activity for you?
It's called school, jackass. Lay off.
If I had all the free time in the world, I would be sure that I spent every moment here, arguing with you endlessly about completely inconsequential games of mafia. I can't imagine a funner or more worthwhile way to spend my time, except possibly purgatory.
I didn't do shit, and I certainly didn't press him to claim. It's ridiculous to hold me responsible for people claiming if they do so in response to my reasoning and arguments on the subject.
This is what you said:
What's whether somebody's town got to do with your vote? [followed by] If my power was helpful, I'd claim so that people would understand why I'm not voting my top suspect.
This prompted him to claim. You certainly expressed curiosity explicitly about his vote power, and your "reasoning and arguments" are what convinced him to claim. It's not "I didn't do shit", is it? Now that you've seen his claim, do you think he should have made it? Why don't you take responsibility for (indirectly, but clearly) suggesting he should claim?
Now you're changing your story. First, I pressed him. Now, I prompted him. Which is it, Bookthras?
And your quote is misleading: You make it seem that my statement about claiming a helpful vote related role was in response to something in an exchange I had with Shakerag, which is not the case. That statement was in response to a hypothetical question
you asked me, or did you forget? Way to continue misrepresenting all my actions.
If you're suggesting that I'm scummy because somebody read my response to your hypothetical question and claimed because of it, that's utter lunacy. If somebody reads my responses and agrees with my reasoning and claims because of it, what the hell did I have to do with that? What the hell am I supposed to do about that? Not answer your questions, because somebody might role claim because of it? Complete and utter lunacy.
Now that you've seen his claim, do you think he should have made it?
Since it's reasonable to think that there probably won't be very many or any killing roles besides the standard mafia kill, I don't think it really matters all that much if he casts his vote for scum, since it won't be very useful for them.
If he wants to be very active with his power, then claiming is a necessity, as he'd have a hard time explaining why he was voting people he thought were town without giving too much of his role away. Really, it'd be impossible to keep a secret at that point. And he has to deal with being a permanent voter as well, which more than likely would have come out on its own anyway.
So, overall, yeah I think he should have claimed.
Why don't you take responsibility for (indirectly, but clearly) suggesting he should claim?
I didn't do shit.
No.
Oh shit i slipped, you can hang me now.
Have it your way.
Unvote,
Pranz.
I don't think shakerag should have claimed at all and i don't really believe him fully.
Liar. You completely believe his claim. You just want his role gone.
Why shouldn't he have claimed?
Shakerag If you vote yourself you obviously don't care about winning.
So what about Shakerag's role claim and his vote makes you think he doesn't care about winning?
Because it all looks obvious enough to me.