Tiruin, dude!
[The whole post concerning flavor]
You got that wrong. I was specifically pointing out on the characters, not flavor in general. First of all, whoever said the place Politibastard takes in is America? But Mod GlyphGryph never said it is in America.
What a ridiculous point. Yes,
of course it's America (or rather, a fictitious America-like country, like the EagleLand McNoble linked you to). Not my doing. See:
and now they were going to battle out it to become the Republican Presidential Nominee.
No, it wasn't just the islamofascist comminazi president and his stooges in congress.
The problem was that some among their number were traitors - political terrorists. RHINOs.
Republican? Comminazi President? Aren't we looking for
RINOs? Primaries, debates and straw polls?
The fact that you don't recognise the setting and names only reveals you as provincial. Not a sin onto itself, but don't blame others for it.
What I don't like is when you compare what flavor a person has to certain historical figures.
What he was doing was trying to understand the set up of the game. Perfectly copacetic effort for a bastard. There is always an underlying puzzle, and regardless of alignment, an important part of playing a bastard game is to solve the puzzle. He tried that by linking roles to people. You may not recognize the people, but clearly GG does, and it's GG's thinking we're trying to unravel. Whether you wish to learn about
Santorum or not is irrelevant; what's relevant is that Santorum is likely a conceptual base for one of the roles. That's neither my fault or yours, it's GG's, and part of the setting. Perfectly fine to try to figure it out.
I still think his idea of at least some roles being based on people is sound. It doesn't mean that's all of them, or that it matters to their alignment. Certainly there is at least one who isn't real (yet): The Dark Horse candidate (Native), as the RL race doesn't have one yet, but its purpose matches Native's stated flavour. Again,
"Dark Horse Candidate" is a real thing in American politics. It's not a name, but it's relevant. It's not our fault if you are unfamiliar with the term.
McNoble: Thanks for pointing that out but That was meant for Book. From what I guessed, he wanted America straight from the first page post. Awaiting his reply (though, this goes far off-topic on how that scumhunt was played. Strange though, how he answered your question.)
I answered it because you said "no flavour", to which I had to reply "hell yes, flavour." Plus I also used names and obscure terminology, didn't I? How many times should I mention Joseph McCarthy before I realise your tirade about "historical figures" was not addressed to me?
There is a Third-Party.
Um, cannot quote the Mod again. First page, OP. Under the "Why is this Mafia" thing. Confirmed.
You
can quote the mod's posts on the thread. What you can't do is quote his PMs. But yes, there is at least one 3rd party. I thought that was obvious.
Social> +Conservative
Economics > +Conservative
This is what I did as frontrunner during the Night. Made useless by the roleblock.
And for the PM: Religion to the Left. Not letting anyone touch that!
a) You said "made useless by the roleblock"
now but you didn't say you were blocked when you claimed them. That makes you scummy.
b) Damn it! "To the left" means "towards liberal"! "To the right" means "towards conservative"! This is again you not knowing shit about politics. It doesn't matter that you read it left to right, it matters what
Left and Right mean in the real world of politics. Really, dude, keep up with the premise of the freakin' game!
Incidentally, Tiruin, what's your role name? Not its powers, just the two sobriquets naming it.
Tiruin: I also want an answer to this question. As to why you should answer it, well, claims are common by D3, but more importantly: if you don't answer it, you are going to die. You'll probably die even if you do, but if you have interest in helping town, the way to do it is to answer this.
McNoble:I have never heard of a vigkill failing to go through just because the vig was offed by the mafia.
True. OK, then I don't need to be front runner, but perhaps some coordination would be of use? Or should we just try to move it towards ourselves? And are we OK with the notion of just lynching one and shooting the other?
But if you didn't lie about your issue shift during N1, then it means that either Toaster lied about one of his but not the other, or he didn't shift at all N1, or that both Native and Mii lied and shifted issues to the left, or that Toaster only shifted one issue but claimed to have shifted two, and either Native or Mii lied and shifted an issue to the left.
None of which is remotely plausible.
Hence, colour me confused.
Maybe we should look at this closer...
PPE: Moderator: Please answer my earlier question:
Which reminds me: Moderator: do we have a time limit on sending you the day-changes on issues? If we haven't by the time the next vote count is posted, we can still send them?