I've got an idea.
Let's no-lynch. Everyone with an action targets me, so IronyOwl and Toaster both target me. If there's a kill, and I receive notice that two actions targeted me, I will be able to confirm that Toaster and IronyOwl were not the ones doing it. If I get less than two notices and there's a kill, then one of them lied, we lynch them no problem we win.
Come tomorrow, if everyone is telling the truth, then the scum can kill Toaster, Jack A T, or IronyOwl.
1) If Toaster is dead, meaning Jack A T or Dariush did the killing, then we lynch Dariush, and then IronyOwl stings Jack A T during the night. Come the following day, I lynch Jack A T with the power of my single vote, we win.
2) If Jack A T is dead, meaning Dariush did the killing, we no-lynch, Toaster shoots Dariush, we win. (Even if Toaster is an SK.)
3) If IronyOwl is dead, meaning Dariush or Jack A T did the killing, then we lynch Jack A T, then Toaster shoots Dariush taking them both out, we win. If Jack A T doesn't comply because he's scum, we tie the vote, Toaster shoots him, then if the game isn't over, we lynch Toaster or just have him shoot Dariush in the night. We win. (Even if Toaster is an SK.)
This is all speculation if I get two notices of actions against me and there's a kill. If there's no kills at all, then we end up right back here again, even if I get two notices of actions.
Obviously this doesn't take into account if I'm scum. But, uh, it would be broken if I were. Even more broken than what people were saying about MBP's role being scum. Pardon the WIFOM.
Also, I haven't confirmed with Meph whether or not I actually get individual notice about each action during the night, or just one general notice, in which case, we'll need a different plan.
Thoughts? I think this plan is pretty solid (from my perspective anyway).