Extend. Sorry about that, things happened. Most of them avoidable.
I am the
Scorpion. At night I can disable a player's vote for the following day. The two claimed ones (Toaster N3, MBP N4) were the only times I did so.
Jack:...Did you read what I wrote? Did you read what you wrote? You tried to turn a discussion that I wasn't using as proof that you were scum into a discussion that I was using as proof that you were scum, through sheer bullshit. Yes, the discussion was relevant, at least to your case. That doesn't mean I tried to use said discussion as proof that you were scum, which is WHAT YOU SAID.
This is exactly what I meant by not being able to just split parts of it off and declare them irrelevant.
The whole thing was about Nuke's plan, and how obvious certain parts of it were. There was no point where I said "Gee, that's great, but let's talk about it just for its own sake," so it stands to reason that if we were discussing it in the first place, it was relevant to something. That something being whether I was twisting his words or you had uncanny insight into his plan.
In short, everything past a certain point was not irrelevant, and it's disingenuous and scummy to suggest it is.
Which is exactly why I DIDN'T SAY THAT. Is it not disingenuous and scummy to try to apply a statement made regarding everything before it to everything after it, without paying attention to what is actually said?
You never said you had stopped using only the glaringly obvious, nor had you given me any reason why you'd do so. I still don't see what reason you'd have to veer off into wild speculation, whether in order to prove I was twisting his words or that you
didn't have some insight into them.
You're twisting my words again. You're turning me saying that not everything falls within the boundaries of one statement into me saying that nothing falls within those boundaries. There is a reason why I used the word "some" to describe the amount of things I said after the "glaringly obvious" statement that it didn't apply to.
I don't follow. Which part is this supposed to be referring to?
Toaster:You I think are town on the grounds that your arguments have been solid, consistent, and well reasoned, with good activity.
Could you elaborate on this?