I still find
Irony quite off (and seriously, damn it, I can read, Irony. That's how I know basic things about what NUKE's plan was. I do not find the ENTIRE PLAN obvious, but I can still recognize certain things it definitely is and certain things it definitely isn't. Because I read it. Is it really so hard to understand this?), but right now, I've got something bigger to deal with.
Simple.
I did not want to draw hasty conclusions from my night actions and reveal myself but apparently they turned out to be pretty informative.
It turns out that every time i blocked you, death count was by one lower than when i did not. N1 we got two deaths : you're free to act , N2 - one death less and you're blocked , N3 : you're blocked and have no kills. That can't be a coincidence.
Does that ring any bells for you Toaster ? Or you would rather want i call you scum ?
...what. Let me get this straight: N1, 1 townie and 1 scum were killed. You were blocking...who were you blocking? N2, 1 townie was killed. You were blocking Toaster. N3, nobody was killed. You were blocking Toaster.
Let's see...
*N1, one of the players killed was scum. This opens the possibility of blocking a vigilante. You know, not scum.
*Expanding on the Vig point, another explanation for part of the post-N1 decrease in kills: vig deciding not to kill. Or SK deciding not to kill, though that's less likely.
*N2 had 1 kill and N3 had no kills. Don't you see the strong possibility of, you know, something else messing with the killings?
*How do you explain the complete lack of kill N3 without the possibility of at least one night's kill decrease being a coincidence?
How do you explain the further lack of a kill N3? What if the N1 'extra' kill was simply due Powder Miner hitting a PWV?
And so on, and so on.Simple, your lurky, voteless, opinion-lacking D3 behaviour doesn't help. Saying you didn't want to jump to conclusions from your night actions right before you jump to conclusions based on your night actions is also quite scummy.
And why block Toaster? You've never visibly found him suspicious. If he's done something scummy enough to warrant blocking, especially compared to the people you have actually said you found suspicious, why not mention it in your case against him?
Hmm?
N1 we got two deaths : you're free to act , N2 - one death less and you're blocked , N3 : you're blocked and have no kills. That can't be a coincidence.
How do you explain the further lack of a kill N3? What if the N1 'extra' kill was simply due Powder Miner hitting a PWV?
And who did you block N1?
It could be a coincidence. And there's the OMGUS angle, although such a blatant OMGUS seems unnecessary. However, I would still like to hear what Toaster has to say about this.
...So, you note major flaws in Simple's case, and yet you proceed to vote Toaster. Why?
Author
Topic: Totem Mafia - A BYOR - Game Over (Read 140271 times)