I like attitude and sentiment of the Cracked article, it's what I've been saying from the beginning. But it has one fundamental flaw-
In the America I thought I lived in, we expect business-people to be driven by profit, but we rely on our Government to protect us from those abuses. We expect Government to set laws to govern what a business can and cannot do. Government can establish a minimum wage, ban child labor, and tax imports. Government can enact rules against predatory lending or . .. anything if it has the support of the people. And we expect our government to keep us safe from this cold unfeeling beast we call capitalism with things like food stamps, Medicaid, unemployment benefits, and social security.
Isn't that the relationship we've all agreed on because it makes sense?
As a matter of fact, no. It would be, if "we" referred only to people who were already at least well-wishers of the "Occupy". But that's not the country; a lot of it maybe (
substantially so, varying only slightly depending on what issue you want to see in Occupy), but not all of it. There is a substantial if minority bloc in the country (see same poll) that gets as far as "we expect business-people to be driven by profit" and considers the rest of the paragraph inherently evil, whether they fully understand it or not.
The problem is, that substantially smaller portion of the electorate gets a lot more positive attention than the other one, mainly because of exactly the people Cracked talks about. Not even really specifically to this event, it's just that "hippies" in general kinda discredited the entire notion of "public protest" as a valid American activity for the last two generations. I was honestly convinced you'd never again see large crowds milling about American streets who weren't either paid to be there or very
very single-issue.