Powder, you might want to break up your paragraphs more. Small walls of text are a bit hard to read.
Perhaps if you weren't being offensive (Not aggressive, offensive) then I wouldn't react so.
That's not how that works. You can't act scummy and/or completely ineffectual, and then blame continuing to do so on being offended.
This is also a good example of a consistent pattern you've been following, wherein you call someone out for convoluted reasons and then do nothing with it. Watch:
Jim Groovester, you seem to be awfully intent on proving your point. Perhaps there is more to that than simple stuborness?
I'm quite uncertain what you meant by the question, that's why I avoided it. I do not actually know why he was not playing, I don't know him. At all. But I think I can see why you asked it. Perhaps you're wondering if he had a role, Orangebottle? Perhaps you are wondering if I'm the doctor, to give you, one of the mafia, a fine target?
As you wish, Powder Miner. Tell me then, again, just what are you basing your claims on me? Why do you keep telling me to be aggressive? Are you perhaps afraid you'll forget to do that? How can you even call me passive? I have a feeling you just barged in here, saw someone who you know not to be scum, tried to make up a reason, and attacked.
You've got a lot of "Oh I see, MAYBE YOU'RE SCUM?!!!?!!?!?!" and no followup on any of it. Even the person you're
currently voting isn't being pressured or responded to beyond "That's ridiculous."
Since you don't seem to have grasped it the first time, mafia is not about wild speculation. The point is not to invent as convoluted a scheme as you can to explain something, it's to figure what's probably
actually the case.
For instance, you and Powder are voting each other right now, right? What does that mean? Could it be that you're scum, hoping to distract from actual scumhunting and ensure that if one falls the other will look incredibly townie?!?!??!?!?
Well... sure, it's physically possible. But there's no reason to assume that over something more sensible, and I think if I voted one of you and FoS'd the other on that theory, you'd rightly think I was out of my mind and/or scum pushing a mislynch. Yet, that's exactly what you've been doing: Jim might well be scum because he wanted to prove his point, Orangebottle was clearly rolefishing by asking about your predecessor's lurking, and Powder's only reason for mentioning aggression is to remind himself to keep doing it personally.
Furthermore, you're not doing anything with any of them- again, even on the person you're "hunting"
right now, you've got no
actual questions out. Reaction fishing is fine up to a point, but what you're doing is just making shit up and hoping it sticks.