Honestly nuke, i'm sorta disappointed you allowed the tackle attempt at all.
Well, I figured there is no way it could go well for Laythe; she was going to look like a crazy, amoral psychobitch infront of the only people still loyal to her. And there isn't really a reason- other than pure 'story'- that she couldn't do it. And Laythe has established herself to be entirely batshit crazy, so, much as I loathe to say it, it was a plausible course of action.
Though I will happily retcon it out of existence. But eventually Laythe will just pull another crazy stunt, and another, and another. At some point we have to stop saying "nope; doesn't make sense" and say, "Okay, you want to be crazy? Be crazy. See how you are dethroned in the next 7 minutes"
What army would turn on her? The 2 or 3 noble levy's she brought? Annihilated due to the limitations on upgrades for noble levies. The Queen paid the wages of the army. No one else -has- much in the way of army, even if its there. Besides, as you like to point out, shes the mad queen. Its entirely plausible she'd do these things. And people just go with it.
Or did you forget that her nobility has no power, and is basically a bunch of figureheads to provide her with crap levies to lose in battles?
No, you don't understand. The regiments which 'belong' to the Queen are not all her personal bodyguards. Some are mercenenaries. Some are made up of levies from minor (NPC) nobles. They are under her 'command', but they are not loyal to
her. Look. I am making a GM statement, here:
Laythe cannot dispose of (all) her nobles. Cannot. Be. Done.
Laythe cannot have AF executed/tortured/thrown into jail forever. Cannot. Be. Done.
Taricus cannot decide to play the singleplayer campaign of YAK II. Cannot. Be. Done.
So stop arguing in favour of the scenario where you are entirely doomed, when I am telling you you are not. Heck, this is a good thing, because it gets rid of Laythe.