Religion is not an innately evil thing.
One: anything (good, evil or moral) can be used as a scapegoat
Example: democratic government -> French Revolutionary Terror period
Example: Betterment of the human race -> Social Darwinism
General: "<positive effect> justifies the means"
Saving souls justifies being a dick
Negative truth: Religion may be used for evil purposes
Two: Religion provides people with a certainty to life
That morality has an actual reason rather than being the result of random chance (or random chance applied to competition)
That there is something more to existence after death
That there is a purpose for humanity and for specific humans
That the final victory of good over evil is ensured.
Three Religion furthers the efforts and effects of individual good
Religious communities are a natural focal point and organizational basis for undeniably good activities (serving the poor and needy, ect.)
Religion is often a starting point for people to fix their lives
Helping others is a common point expressed in religious services, providing a constant reminder for people to do good things
Four: Religion is an amorphous term
Taking Bible passages literally as examples of GOD IS EVUL isn't relevant, considering that the majority of Christians don't literally take the Bible and/or do not follow said passages.
Some SMBC comics that seemed somewhat related that I found when typing this.
In a religious setting, I'm the least religious person there. On Bay 12, I'm the most. What's up with that?
Specifc Rebutal
1: Says you, arguing with belief is a pointless endeavor. See also "mystery of faith"
2: Says you. Closest thing I've ever had to be physically forced into a church service is the last time that I guy driving by me on the street asked me if I'd like to join him for a service. See also non-rebuttal points one through three. Religion provides comfort and certainty for people.
3: Ascribing terms like amoral or evil to omniscient beings is difficult at best and pointless at worst. Whole 'nother discussion, really.
4: Not specific to Religion. Any type of opinion does this.
5: Really? See non-rebuttal point one as well as "conspiracy theory." Unless it's supposed to be about authoritarian theocracies, in which case just see non-rebuttal point one.