The way I see it, these guys have a lot more legitimate reasons to revolt than the Americans had to secede from the British Empire. Would you say that the American Revolution was wrong, Pseudonymous?
I would say it was pointless, yes. A handful of wealthy businessmen who didn't like the trade restrictions and tariffs riled up the populace, which consisted in a large part of religious fanatics who didn't like England to start with (hence why they or their parents left it). Much pointless bloodshed later a weak, fragmented state appeared, and promptly collapsed under its own weight, before they realized that "hey, a weak, fragmented state is a fucktarded thing to want," and managed to pull together a stronger, more unified state with what amounts to chewing gum and duct tape (and imposing the same sort of taxes that they ostensibly revolted against, though by that point the people who didn't like those taxes were in the Government, and thus benefited from them). It could have failed at any of a thousand points; it floundered for decades before shakily getting to its feet.
Revolutions almost never end well. Especially not in third world shitholes, where
Cuba is an example of the best case scenario, with the norm being far, far worse. It is not good that one backwater shithole after another is going up in flames. Egypt is going to be much worse off for this, especially with dipshits trying to disseminate inflammatory cables, to further rile up the already pissed-off-and-torching-everything-in-sight revolutionaries.