Jack A T:
Okay, I was planning on waiting and watching for today, but this is just painful to watch.
So you were planning on lurking?
As I explained earlier, yes, for this one day, barring anything going utterly insane.
You're mainly echoing Janus here, and you don't add anything original to the discussion. Further, you don't question him to either strengthen or allay your suspicions. Your words imply you're done for the day as well. Basically, this is all very passive. Being this passive does not contribute to the town at all.
Do you have other reasons to suspect him? Why didn't you ask him questions? Who else do you suspect, and why?
My passivity: From prior experience, I've found that being passive and getting yelled at is better than being active and getting lynched for pointing contradictions and odd habits out. Yeah, my prior experience sucks.
Echoing Janus: I pretty much share his opinion of Mysterious at the moment, minus the original evidence. Besides, I found a quote of his that was being ignored although it badly damaged one of Mysterious's arguments, and I felt like pointing that out.
Other reasons to suspect Mysterious: The guy doesn't seem to be reading Janus's arguments, as I tried to point out with my Janus quote. Janus, while a bit pushy, at least looks like he's reading Mysterious's arguments. Also, the whole "insult everyone and imply you're really, really important" thing, from what I've seen, is the last action of many, many lynched scum players. Quick disclaimer: I'm not used to mafia on this forum.
Why didn't I question him? I'm really not sure what to ask him. So...uh...yeah. Pretty bad reason.
Other people I suspect: Janus, basically. He viewed the weakest evidence ever as worth pointing out, and kind of emphasized it. Main reason I'm not voting for him is Mysterious's reaction: too strong for the evidence, as if panicking, while also contributing to the emphasis that the weak evidence got.