I'd have to say Dariush because of his previous jumpiness and apparent inability to answer questions coupled with his general lack of effective scumhunting. He choses to complain about other people's tactics rather than apply his own.
Dariush, how do you feel about scumhunting and questioning now that it's D2? Are you still going to be stubborn about it?
Once again, my question's uselessness was because I vastly overestimated the importance of Kingmaker's death. I was looking in the wrong direction. Now, my failty scumhunting? Wasn't almost everyone wrong about Zrk2?
The night wasn't as helpful as I hoped it would be, so I'll have to work with what I've got now.
webadict, how come I SUDDENLY move from being '90% to the gallows' to not even being in your top two pick? And is 'guts feeling' the only justification you're going to give for your suspicion? .
NativeForeigner and Jim, you're accusing me of lack of scumhunting. Pray tell me, what did you learn in the past day?
The last question bugs me the most. The questions I asked turned out to be irrelevant; the questions you asked were random and irrelevant from the start. Of what am I accused except not asking the same random questions? I want to hear everyone's information extracted from D1 without bringing up my lack of questioning.
What are you TALKING about? It's top THREE, and you were, in fact, in them! Why can you not pay a single iota of attention? How many photons must be wasted on your unreceptive eyes?!?
Second question: Yeah, pretty much. It was mostly gut feeling. If you've got a problem with that, then fine. There's not going to be much more I can give you.
Here's my info from D1: You suck, Pandarsenic sucks, and Zrk2 really sucked. I'd like to see you argue that he didn't deserve to be lynched.
Well zrk2 supported one of my previous post and did a mistake in his list, which might strike someone as odd.
Did I look like a potential scumbuddy to you at that time? If yes, why didn't you question me? Or did you wanted to wait and see, if zrk2 flips scum first?
You looked like it, but it was only based on zrk2, and therefore useless without a flip from him.
Hey Webadict, can you at least give us some cheese with that wine?
Yeah, sure. Whatever. No need to point out specific passages for anyone else. Wanna be a little more active in the game? Or do you enjoy making snide comments that pretty much prove you as being a horrendous player? I'd equate you with Org, except he actually has moments of not being useless.
Unfortunately, you're not going to get anything bigger out of me, because it was mostly gut feeling.
. . .
That's because I went through everyone's post, and if I felt like they were being townlike, crossed them off. It was a gut-check approach.
Okay, gut feelings. I can buy that, up to a certain point anyway.
What were you looking for when you decided people were town? The three people you mentioned failed somehow, so how did they fail?
Participation, mostly. Explanations. People trying to play. And then slight intuition.
And as for two scum picks, I was pretty sure zrk was scum, so who knows? Push me on it. I don't care. Probably you and... I dunno... Native. Good enough for you?
Not really. Why?
Because I figured I'd go with someone I didn't suspect at all due to activity (The irony being that I should've been watching content [I also realize now that he's accused me, but whatever]), and you because, well, I figure if you're scum, you'll be wary of me now, and if you're not, you'll be wary of me anyway.
So your scum picks are basically completely arbitrary at this point.
Not really. NativeForeigner has been bugging me, but I'm not sure why. I feel like he's participating more than anyone else, and if he's scum, I wouldn't mind him winning because he's actually trying. I also listed you because... I'm not sure. Maybe you'll lynch me. It'd certainly make my job easier. I guess maybe you don't really need to be suspected, because Pandarsenic is doing such an amazing job at making himself look like complete garbage.
I'd like to note Pandarsenic's lack of scumhunting has not been brought up, yet Dariush's has. Rant rant rant rant about Pandarsenic.
Just to be clear, you've got all this to say about Pandarsenic, but you don't suspect him. Presumably if you did you would've stated so.
No, I suspect him. You were simply asking for two people. Big difference.
And you're argument for me is... How do I put this to make you sound like like a moron... moronic? I'm your second choice because I lynched town would maybe be an okay answer. Not great, but not horrible. However, because I thought Jokerman-EXE might be scum and him turning up town is stupid. No, think about it: If I felt Dariush, Pandarsenic, and Jokerman-EXE were scum, then if they weren't all scum, I'd be scummy? Well, seeing as there's two scum, I'd like to note the apparent crap in your argument: You conveniently left out Dariush to make that argument sound, because otherwise it makes no sense to begin with. You might as well accuse everyone here for not trusting everyone else but their suspects as scummy.
That's not my argument, but great job trying to make me look like a moron for it.
That's NativeForeigner I was talking to... Not you. Not the quoted part to which this is a response to. I even rechecked my post to make sure that it wasn't a postfail. It wasn't.
Here's why I suspect you: You provided no reasons for why you suspected Jokerman-EXE and Pandarsenic. Jokerman-EXE flipping town has nothing to do with it. And I didn't include Dariush because you stated reasons for why you suspected him.
Understandable. Look above for Dariush.
Reasonless suspicions are always scummy. If you say you suspect somebody, you better have the arguments to back it up, otherwise, you're just trying to avoid suspicion by having token ones. Now that I'm getting reasons for your suspicions you're looking better, but you're still not completely cleared.
I could create an argument, but it'd only be WIFOM, and we all know how much Pandarsenic will troll if I post that.
Please, also note that I was the one after Dariush and has probably supplied you with most of your rhetoric in your argument. I'm the one that pointed out Dariush as not answering questions, and for him failing to go into details. Basically, everything you might be accusing Dariush of can originate to me. But, if you feel I'm scum, how can you trust an argument like that?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Isn't my beef with Dariush that he only asked questions because he was pressed into it? What does that have to do with you?
And this is a weird way to get me to... not suspect Dariush? I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish with this.
... NativeForeigner. Please pay attention. I realize you were quoted inside the NF quote, but it's not directed at you.
Here's what I've learned: webadict isn't quite as full of shit as he previously appeared, but fuck him because it took longer than it should have to get this out. But he's not completely cleared because he's got issues with Pandarsenic but doesn't apparently suspect him, and his scum picks for the today are absolutely atrocious and appear completely arbitrary.
I never said I don't suspect him. You only asked for two people, and I gave you two people. Jumping to conclusions isn't advised.
As I've said before, he still hasn't explained why - he's just saying "because he did" and WIFOMing relentlessly and going "Have I mentioned how awesome I am?" while looking like a scumbukkit.
I have explained. It simply isn't good enough for you. Choose your words better, since the other way is an intentional misrepresentation of the situation.
Also, I "[haven't] really done a whole lot"? Srsly? At least point out that I was one of the people going after Zrk2 heavily if you're going to accuse me of something.
Wow. He really turned out to be scum, didn't he? If you're going to claim to be "doing a lot," then try picking something that benefited the town.
My commentary is not passive. My commentary is at worst passive-aggressive. I am pointing out that people (Webadicts) are scummy, shortly after posts of his that demonstrate my complaints soundly enough. If you can't tell what my complaint is when I say
It is passive, since you're not making an active case against me. You'll simply post - without quotes - about how much WIFOM or some other crap the last post had. It's making no effort to actively engage in a case, and it also makes you active lurk at the same time. So, yeah.
Idiot.
Sorry for any delay. I've been rather busy this week.