So, five pages of talk and not a single useful thing said.
Dariush: Same scenario as Jokerman, but you know almost certainly that someone other than the town's pick is scum.
You mean that the town's pick is 100% town and they don't know it? Then I'll do my own decision. Actually, I would do the same even in Jokerman's question.
Why do you and webadict ask different people different questions, not related to what they said previously in the game? Are you scum and don't care who gets executed (well, except a power-role)?
Or are you the Kingmaker and will base your choice on our answers?
Ottofar, and what if there are no doctors? We just lose the Kingmaker? Too risky in my opinion.
Jim, why didn't you start attacking me from first minutes as is your tradition? Are you hiding something?
You've got my full attention now, pal. In fact, you're about 90% of the way to the gallows.
The way I see it, if there's been five pages of talk and nothing useful said, what have you contributed? Would that be nothing? Because, looking back, that IS what you've contributed.
Let's review:
Dariush: How do you believe scum would play this game?
I think they'll try to kill everyone.
No, really, looking at previous games, they were killing the most experienced players while the scum was the most lurky lurker. So, I think we should start with them.
So, you're really showing us how it's done here with the first sentence. I mean, with that sentence alone, I felt like you were a powerhouse to be dealt with. And the way you support that premise is simply astounding. I
almost sucked a lemon right there.
I mean, you showed up and answered my question, leaving to go show us how it's done. And by this, I mean you showed up and answered my question like crap, then booked it on out of here in order to lurk until I told you to re-answer it.
Dariush: How do you believe scum would play this game?
I think they'll try to kill everyone.
No, really, looking at previous games, they were killing the most experienced players while the scum was the most lurky lurker. So, I think we should start with them.
Oh, you're pretty clever.
See, you didn't adequately answer my question. I want to know how you think a scum would play. Not who I should go after. Not what happened in previous games. Just your plan and simple thoughts.
Really? I don't have a freaking idea how scum would play apart from quoting last game, which you dismissed. If I was scum, I would have gone after the most experienced players and generally played depending on situation.
However, because I especially dislike your answer, you'll have to answer another question: How should a townie play this game? Answer as a King, a Townie, and a Kingmaker.
So, you won't buy the answer 'hunting scum'. Why does it look like you're just looking for a reason to execute me? I can't give a more specific answer unless I have specific circumstances.
I was gonna answer this sooner, but I've been busy.
But, you've really proven your point by doing absolutely nothing. I certainly am looking for a reason to execute you now. You answer was crap and you know it. Your defense for that is I'm looking for a reason to type out an execution order on you? Nice.
So, now, why shouldn't I lynch you? What do you have to contribute to our game? Do you plan to lurk a whole ton instead? Do you feel my questions aren't helping me determine who's scum?
Also, the Kingmaker changes on death. Nice thinking, Tex.