Save for drawing out those overeager to pounce on opening questions, Janus.
Do you really believe that this is indicative of scumminess? For me in particular? I do the same thing in every game I'm in.
Vague attacks and an urge to appear active are indicative of scumminess in anyone.
True. But I thought the point was the overeagerness to attack opening questions. And I think that my general attitude on lurkers would explain any want to be active.
Eh, bored, I'll continue catching up later.
Is it later yet? The game is still moving fast enough that lurking is too easy to miss.
While I'm dragging up a few older posts, I feel like pointing out I would of voted SHAD0Wdump yesterday, but I really want to give a Zoologist a chance to grab him first. I still do.
Why did you feel the need to phrase this this way? It looks like you're being defensive for something you haven't been accused of.
I do agree that on first look a Zoologist would certaintly pick up SHAD0Wdump, but on second loop there's all sorts of ways that could go wrong. Prime target for a Reporter, plasma bomb, night kill, prolly a few other things.
If you were only calling for an Org policy lynch to get the conversation started, why did you spend nearly all of your time bickering with Org instead of actually talking to any of the other people talking about the Org policy lynch you suggested?
Because he was there. And I did somewhat, although you are quite correct that I could have done more. Not going to work in another game though, so meh?
And I also wanted to get him talking. He can actually rarely be surprisingly deep if he actually bothers to play. Which he hasn't since then...
ORG, where'd you go again?
Pre-post edit:
Hm. Yeah, So my top three scum are
Janus, Kamina, and Shadow. I think Kamina is it, so there.
Oh. There. Shiny.
I can guess why you'd pick me and the others have lots of suspcion on them so far, so that's reasonable enough. Why Kamina first in particular? Any why no vote? (I don't remember who / if you're voting).