archangel! you are under my command! you will speculate as to when in the game your role-powers will become most useful!
also, org is acting normal... for org. but i don't like how quick he was to put a 2nd vote on zathras. just sayin'
Really? You want him to speculate on when he'll be useful so scum know when to dispose of him? Oh, and then two votes is bandwagoning I guess.
Who are you most wary of and why?
winners of the last game, given their heightened powers.
Who do you want to hear from most?
at the moment, the people who haven't posted yet; hence why i poked you. guess you're off of that list, then.
Do you have any suspicions yet?
not very strong suspicions, but i'm keeping an eye on org. and you, for that matter, you question-dodging scum!
so if you won't answer my original question, would you care to answer those questions you just quoted at me?
You then proceed to explain that you fear powerful individuals, you suspect the guy you just said was acting normal, say Archangel is dodging your question for a third time, and drop your question for a copy of the ones he just asked you.
Yeeeaaaah.
and no, it was basically just a less run-of-the-mill voteprod. hopefully, something a bit different might catch the scum out.
And how exactly is this question a simple voteprod? What answer are they supposed to give that is both not scummy and not feeding scum information?
i stopped asking him the original question because it was becoming plain that i wasn't going to get an answer.
If it's a reasonable question,
why is it not scummy to refuse to answer? If it's the sort of question that's perfectly reasonable for town to refuse to answer,
why did you ask it? and i ain't done with him yet. my vote is still on him, and my questions still stand.
So you still want him to explain his role.
the least i can say for you, toaster, is that i'm glad that there's someone out there that's getting down to the business of scumhunting. that's what i'll put this little bit of aggression down to... for the time being. even if this comes very soon after the first vote for me (won't you be following up on that vote with some questioning, breadbocks?)
How
magnanimous of you to forgive Toaster's
unusual aggression as probably scum hunting,
for the moment. Particularly
gracious given he's the second vote on you, which is
terribly suspicious.
Scatterbrain. Obvscum.
IronyOwl, who are you most wary of and why?
Who do you want to hear from most?
Do you have any suspicions yet?
Tylui has a point on Pandarsenic, see below. Org is unreadable at this point.
Scatterbrain's response should be interesting.
Scatterbrain, Org, breadbocks. Pandarsenic but only for highly questionable reasons.
But seriously, I have a hunch that Pandar is scum. He picked a pony last game. And won. He's probably feeling pretty sinister this time around, what with extra powers and all. I bet he picked a nice scummy character.
This is purely hypothetical meta, but it sounds likely. Especially given his absence, not that I'm one to talk on that note.
Pandarsenic, who do you suspect and why? You can wait 'til you're not high on pony dust. I mean medication.
Org strikes me as being intentionally bizarre. I don't know if he's scum or not, but I think he's decided to act too weird for anyone to read in the hopes that it makes him unlynchable.
Make sense or die,
Org.
Author
Topic: BYOR 5 - Night 3: Under Con-Troll. (Read 70226 times)