Oh, well now that I've called you out on it you'll bother to respond. Or read it in the first place? I'm not sure why you keep mentioning that you don't read the thread like it's a good thing, but I'd have to guess it's a nice excuse to not know what's going on and look cool doing it.
Of course, if you think I'm talking a lot without saying much, feel free to show me how it's done. Just take what I've written and shear the excess garbage off without losing meaning, and voila! You've shown I'm a pompous ass. You're not going to do that, are you?
Oh, and speaking of low content-to-words ratios, you've responded to eight questions with a blatantly false "could happen", one FUCKYEAHIMSOAWESOME, two "go read I'm not explaining it"s, two pictures of strawmen, and two bad reasons you should have provided when you made the statements to begin with. Truly, you've gone out of your way to explain your actions in detail, what with half being refusals to answer and at least a quarter being giving me the finger.
But oh, it seems I'm not Pandarsenic and so don't like to sling bullshit without backing it up. So, let's start with his "could happen."
Are you trying to say, after voting him for vote-hopping, that scum would have simply vote-hopped off without consequence, and hence any previous behavior of yours is beyond reproach? Not like it can't be done. It took until pretty recently for someone to point out that that appears to be precisely what Ottofar did.
*BZZZZZZZT!* I'm sorry, the correct answer is
the very next post after his pointed that out!Oh dear. Eight pages in which I haven't posted. On monday nothing interesting had happened to post about, and on tuesday, I got home late, and posted a quick thing, but the electricity went down, taking the internet with it. I'll do a longer post tomorrow, assuming I have time.
Unvote
Vote Eduren, you were defending Vector, and I'd like to see your alignment. Or Vector's.
Uh, doodabuddy. You pop out for out pages and you pop in with a vote that says nothing less than "you were defending someone! I keel you." ? Seriously? No questions, no real allegations, no evidence? No commentary on the other players, just another vote dropped with no extra analysis?
This is sloppy scumhunting at the best, and scummy at the worst. Shape up or hang, scumbucket.
Once again, he either can't read or is an outright liar.
Moving on, let's see about that quote he put up as though it meant something, then ignored for several pages.
Hey, wait, THIS WAS YOU
Yes, it was. Are you going somewhere with this? Why'd you include your question but not my response?
Because the "I am willing to lynch someone whom I don't believe is scum" sentiment is what matters. That he was, in fact, scum, means that this lets you say you were fine with lynching him if he gets killed and flips scum while still not committing against him.
What's that? ACTUAL EXPLANATION OF WHY I'M SUSPICIOUS? Egads, it's a miracle! He actually explained
why I'm scum for once!
Unfortunately, it's a really bad reason. For one, I already explained why I felt that way. Unless he can explain why that explanation was no good, the best he can really do here is say I'm still shifty.
More importantly, however, it wasn't necessary in the slightest. We started with what, 15 people? Four voted for Spartan, which means a full ten weren't voting for him. If I was desperate for some town cred, why have I never brought it up, and why didn't I vote for him when it became obvious he wasn't going to make it? If I wasn't, why bother? What's to gain here by quasi-bussing him?
So next up, Pandarsenic finally explains why he's had no defense other than to call me scum:
You fought me over the votecount and who "found" Spartan, but otherwise you've had no interest whatsoever in explaining yourself beyond attacking your attacker.
Oh, PUHLEASE. You're not lecturing me on when a vote is or is not an OMGUS and when an OMGUS is or is not a scumtell. Don't even try. I went there and back before you even came to this subforum and [CENSORED because somebody would've reported it for being too graphic]. Don't try to pull that on me.
I love this one. He goes into an obscenity-laden I-was-doin-this-before-you-was-born-kid rant about OMGUSing, in response to my reference to "attacking the attacker." What does "attacking" mean? Well, for a townie, I don't know, asking questions, explaining why someone's scum, pointing out holes in someone's arguments?
For scum? Obviously, I'm talking about votes, since that's what scum's really scared of, isn't it?
So please, if anyone has any further doubts about this scumbucket's alignment, do point them out for me. Otherwise I'd like to get down to business.