Be less useful and I will kill you less. You are on a good track now though, no question AND you are random voting me when I got a random vote already.
I suspect this refers to the Game which Shall Not Be Named, but the present tense involved made me narrow my eyes.
Note for the people attacking Blarg because he is not posting; his last post was the last time he was on, give him some time.
This bit, which I commented on yesterday.
Four: He is a happy fucker and that does need to be looked into.
This smells of OH CRAP STOP FOLLOWING THAT LEAD, but as it refers to Spit, I don't know what to think of it.
Rereading the thread *again*, I'm starting to think that Webadict's predecessor, Charlemagne, was not being absent-minded, but was being sneaky. He posted a few times yesterday; he ignored any and all requests for him to participate, and asked questions as if he were looking in on us in the game trying desperately to find scum, as if he were outside it. Perhaps I should rephrase that- us in the town. I'm not voting because of his long absences from the thread- I'm not a hypocrite- I'm voting because whenever he did post, it was never relevant or even a stab-in-the-dark. If he was scum (and I am convinced he was), then that bescumbency has passed on to Webadict.
Hi! So, I just got here and was about to read the thread when I noticed that you're voting me for something I can't possibly defend against. I am, in fact, unaware of the
vote count right now. We should get one.
While I'm sure they're very valid reasons in Crazy Town, I'm gonna do my best to address them.
Also, am I to assume those quotes are from me? There's no reference quote, which makes it entirely out of context for me, as well as impossible to figure out who said it or what's happening in them. Again, that only ruins what you're trying to establish.
So, let's start and end at the bottom:
Rereading the thread *again*, I'm starting to think that Webadict's predecessor, Charlemagne, was not being absent-minded, but was being sneaky. He posted a few times yesterday; he ignored any and all requests for him to participate, and asked questions as if he were looking in on us in the game trying desperately to find scum, as if he were outside it. Perhaps I should rephrase that- us in the town. I'm not voting because of his long absences from the thread- I'm not a hypocrite- I'm voting because whenever he did post, it was never relevant or even a stab-in-the-dark. If he was scum (and I am convinced he was), then that bescumbency has passed on to Webadict.
If he was being so sneaky, why is he forcibly replaced? That's terrible reasoning. I wouldn't be here if he were lurking. He'd do better lurking it out until the next Day, seeing as how tomorrow would be lylo. He clearly didn't ignore the requests on purpose: I'M HERE!
You start to make a point until you destroy yourself where you note he was asking questions. Not only does that not make any sense to me (No quotes), but it sounds RELEVANT! That's what most games entitle. The point is to find scummy people through their words, so asking questions makes a whole lot of sense.
And then there was that rephrasing. You HAD to make it scummy, didn't you? It sounded like it made sense beforehand, but the clarification sounds like you're trying to force the idea that you're part of the Town, as opposed to the implied sense that everyone ALREADY IS, or at the very least, trying to blend in.
And then a bit more vague comments about my predecessor's posting (Again, you're not aiming the argument at me, you're aiming it at everyone else) followed by calling me scum.
Maybe once I post more you can target me and not behind me.
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia X, Restart[MAFIA WIN] (Read 34859 times)