Sorry, I have been lurking. I blame procrastination. Every time it's "I'll post in this thread a little later"... eh.
Unvote diakron.
Now, as for your own query back at me, my opinion is much similar. I think its not really a serious scumtell at all, however, it probably is better than just randomly voting around. However, I don't agree with his stance.
Fair enough - reasons, though?
Angry stuff.
To be honest, this looks like town webadict to me. Scum webadict is more mild, although there is the possibility of self-meta manipulation. I don't really get run on sentences as a scumtell; they crop up in my writing all the time, and it's more a pandar-tell anyway.
This is the same deal. It sounds hesitant, non-direct - which is just the sort of way scum feels. I see that Dak mentions all of this in his arguments, looking back over, but I still think it's rapidly approaching the significant level. Unvote Nirur Torir, vote Webadict. It's good enough for me, frankly.
Funnily enough, I think this quote applies a lot more to itself than it does to the thing SB was quoting. He doesn't make a direct accusation, only saying that it
feels like scum, and that it's "good enough" (for what? A lynch? Further examination? A bandwagon?).
Way to jump into the sky over something "minor". Hell, those points weren't good, but you leaping like a Mexican Jumping Bean was.
This is also suspicious,
SirBayer. You admit to having bad posts, but are using that as a way of strengthening your case due to an "overreaction". Firstly, I'm not sure overreaction can ever be seen as a scumtell on webadict, and secondly, you aren't trying to back up this point, probably because webadict would demolish it if you did. So, SirBayer - what is your actual case on webadict? I'd like you to make it without reference to overreaction to bad points.
You did jump when it looked like Bayer was joining a bandwagon against you. According to General Mountainterror's Guide to Mafia, page 266, people getting overly wordy at being bandwagoned need to be bandwagoned further.
Nirur Torir, if you vote someone while SAYING it is just a bandwagonning vote, you aren't adding any pressure. You're just trying to look active and appearing to do something. And it looked suspiciously like you were distancing yourself from Bayer earlier.
Conclusion: Webby is either failing scum today or a jester.
Your case isn't nearly strong enough to justify such a conclusion and you know it.
Webadict what's the matter? did you get caught as scum and are panicking?
Lame accusation is lame. Diakron, any real reasons?
For now, I want Leafsnail to get in here and find scum.
Well, if you want me to find scum, why are you voting me :/?
In summary - SirBayer and Nirur Torir look bad, and I see a connection. Diakron's being extremely lame and possibly scum.