I mean, people are calling me lazy this game, but it's 44 pages of this. We're already twice as long as Roden's Demon Mafia... now that was a game I enjoyed.
Unvote, I like FoU better now they're taking some real stances. Killing them with Jack would get rid of two players I'm not sure about, but for now maybe not.
@Web: I had you down as "maybe scum, possibly 3P", not "definitely 3P". Still do. So that's really not what my read was.
"my gems, my gems, my gems, my gems"
Oh god, have I become TricMagic?
For a minute, you did, why I'm not dropping the 3P possibility. It's looking much less likely now that you seem more interested in killing people, as opposed to going on about gems or idle bickering. Doesn't mean you're not scum, especially with the largely unconstructive engagement with Imp, but at least it's not 3P behaviour.
The CM wagon is something, but I'd need to be satisfied this was scum weak D1 and not newer player weak D1.
...
Hm. No, I don't like the CM elim, I think they struggle with null reads D1 and sheep a bit as town. In the armed forces game, they followed public opinion quite hard, especially EP.
(See
this post where they explain their vigilante nightkill choices, then immediately say that it wasn't a good decision because I looked worse. Potentially reasonable, but it does look like the EP post a few inches above that just swung their opinion.)
Hmm. I especially don't like three strong players piling on, though I guess EP seeing a procedural thing like sheeping and voting on it is pretty in character. Max seems to be being genuinely very interested in scumhunting today, which is weird but maybe a good sign unless they're on a bad elim? And I don't pretend to be able to read Web. Don't like Toony thinking about hopping on it either.
Out of time now but need to look harder at EJ, Imp and QQ. EJ in particular might be a sensible elim... shame about FoU but triple eliminating would be hilarious.