Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[webadict]

I'm going to leash a vote on webadict for now. He isn't acting like himself and his grammar is really bad on purpose. Something isn't right with him. He's either being a troll!Town or a Mafia trying to tone his posts as a troll!Town.

ok but is i mafa or not? i feel maybe u red name nightwing first see how that go

i am plain barbarian i make thing go crunch i not troll ok maybe little like troll like fire bad and strong and eat only one baby but just one

[Lidku]

This is a bad vote.

It's obviously not my vote or a deterministic vote. It is just a "leash-vote" because I find the way webadict is acting/posting.. strange. The only "normal post" he had since the game started, was his initial read difficulty post.

[ToonyMan]

This is a bad vote.

It's obviously not my vote or a deterministic vote. It is just a "leash-vote" because I find the way webadict is acting/posting.. strange. The only "normal post" he had since the game started, was his initial read difficulty post.

You won't even own up to your vote? It's a poor vote because you're saying Webadict is either town or mafia.

[Lidku]

Also, ToonyMan.. I don't get why you say it's a bad vote.. considering you also have voted for webadict for acting strangely just as I have (and you have yet to unvote them..). Can you explain why my vote along the same reasoning is bad, but yours specially isn't?

[webadict]

i say ok that good but maybe say if nightwing good guy bad gu but not hear you say that yet which seem not good to me but maybe wait for no if nightwing good guy bad guy

it probly not max tho he not put life in bad way for nightwing shot and not day one either

this is plain think yes?

Also, ToonyMan.. I don't get why you say it's a bad vote.. considering you also have voted for webadict for acting strangely just as I have (and you have yet to unvote them..). Can you explain why my vote along the same reasoning is bad, but yours specially isn't?

toony vote push and feel town good lidku vote sit and look busy not good

[Lidku]

Also, ToonyMan.. I don't get why you say it's a bad vote.. considering you also have voted for webadict for acting strangely just as I have (and you have yet to unvote them..). Can you explain why my vote along the same reasoning is bad, but yours specially isn't?

I'd like to add that it seems I was mistaken here. I re-read part of the thread and it seems ToonyMan switched to Knightwing.. but still, ToonyMan had the same(?) reasoning for initially voting for webadict like I did..

As a matter-of-fact, when Jim asked Toony why he voted for webadict, he just ignored Jim..

[ToonyMan]

Also, ToonyMan.. I don't get why you say it's a bad vote.. considering you also have voted for webadict for acting strangely just as I have (and you have yet to unvote them..). Can you explain why my vote along the same reasoning is bad, but yours specially isn't?

I voted Webadict for copying my post at game start and not contributing anything meaningful. Since then I've turned around and feel relatively good about Webadict and don't wish to vote him today. This is because even though Webadict has been posting like an 18-year-old on a dating site he is actively contributing to the game and appears honest.

[webadict]

red name good guy is clear! i strong like troll toony see that see say thing and also have many candy not bad guy

how you say toony bad you do same red name that not make sense

you copycat toony that make you need more thought in red name not toony that how time work

[Lidku]

I was re-reading the thread again (yeah, I mostly just skim at first when a large amount of time has passed with a lot of activity and I missed a lot) and apparently Lenglon is going to shoot me no matter what on N1, just because they flimsily suspect they're going to be the N1 kill?

Wut?

[ToonyMan]

I was re-reading the thread again (yeah, I mostly just skim at first when a large amount of time has passed with a lot of activity and I missed a lot) and apparently Lenglon is going to shoot me no matter what on N1, just because they flimsily suspect they're going to be the N1 kill?

Wut?

Worried about Lenglon possibly shooting you tonight?

[NJW2000]

Spoiler: replies to Lidku (click to show/hide)

Something weird did come up: Lidku's idea that you'd shoot mafia nobody else suspected. There are some reasons doing that could be an ok plan, but Lidku hasn't explained why stripping away a bulletproof vest would help if nobody was willing to go after the person with you.
Lidku: why would this be helpful?

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to put across here. Using my gun is one ability within itself. It does not "consume" or "strip away" my use of my vest.

Unless you mean the "auto" in the vest tag means that 1 bullet is consumed by the shooter, and that the vest is consumed via defense for the victim; wherein another person at NIGHT also has to follow along shooting the target, within the same night...

I see it differently (and correct me if I'm wrong), the "auto" in the vest tag just means its priority is always first over either a bullet Vigilante-kill and a Mafia-Kill. Beyond that at night, you either have to choose to use your gun or use your vest, or do nothing.

Using your gun on someone strips away their vest. Everyone has a vest, it's in the OP.

I have been acting on the assumption that the auto bit means that you use your vest automatically every night until it is consumed by being shot. This makes much more sense to me, but I'm checking it with the mod anyhow.

And also, NJW, your question further makes no sense, because Town cannot communicate during the Night. The only chance of orchestrating who to in a combined shoot-off would only be possible on a day turn.

The inherent theme of this game (from what I personally gather), is that everyone in Town can equally at least one-shot someone else; unless the person who is paranoid that they're going to get shot uses their vest, thus having a potential kill against them be negated.

So nothing about what you asked me made sense to begin with. Mind explaining where you got "why stripping away a bulletproof vest would help if nobody was willing to go after the person with you" idea from?

You'd need two people shooting to take a vest off someone and then kill them. And we only get one shot. If nobody suspected the person, you'd only have taken the vest off them.

Hence all the talk of double-tapping people.

Again, this stems from me interpreting "auto-self" as "used on yourself automatically every night", which you clearly didn't.

Ok, I don't think Lidku TMI'd. One of us has heavily misinterpreted the setup (pretty sure it's him), but that's only grounds to look carefully at him.


Lidku: Web's D1 meta includes throwing his shit at people and licking his fingers afterwards. It's not a scumtell and people aren't going to lim him on it. If this is all you have, go back through the thread and scumhunt.

Which is also the thing I'm going to do.
EDIT: Looks like you've made a start.

[Lidku]

Worried about Lenglon possibly shooting you tonight?

It's not a "possibility" when they've literally said they're going to do as such.

[Lenglon]

Lidku, why do you care that I'm going to shoot you?

Toony said they're going to shoot me tonight after Knightwing flips scum, and I honestly do not mind.

[Knightwing64]

I’m… not scum? I mean, you can vote me, I guess. I’m kinda used to it at this point.

What happened to don’t shoot the medic?

Whatever, you will all be sorry when I bring my medkits to the grave with me muhahahaha

[webadict]

nightwing you say medic but tone say dont care and that bad guy say so why no red name?