I don't understand why NJW and Jack both townread Vector.
I've explained my reasoning already, Toony, come on. The post about poison means I don't want to lynch them D1, because I don't think scum would lie about that or immediately give up that information. I haven't yet seen any strong reason to believe they're scum. Ergo, they're in the town section of my readslist.
I mean, if they don't post anything else before the end of the day, that's a different matter. I'm assuming that we're going to see more than ten sentences from them though. Unsure how I'd respond to someone just not really turning up.
Why are you so caught up on this? Is there something I'm not putting clearly?
@NJW: You have bad picks and bad intuition. You are voting for a Townie. Clearly, I am the one that is scum-sided. You have at least 2 Townies in your top 3, so keep up.
Well, you'd know.
Literally, I'm pretty sure you know who is and isn't town because you're scum. You fill the thread with
walls of garbage, you misrepresent me,
argue against points I didn't even make, and when I call you out on it, the response is "
oh, I've hidden the replies in this pile of nonsense, go dig. Also I'm better than you". If you genuinely wanted to stop answering my questions, you wouldn't tell me I can go through your posts with a fine-toothed comb or shove one where the sun don't shine, you'd politely disengage. The textwalls come out as soon as there's a vote on you, and you offer
multiple explanations for your actions, claiming they're for your own amusement but also actually to gain information. I've seen mad and chaotic town-sided play, sure, and I've seen mad and chaotic scum-sided play. You're doing the latter. I'm not dumb enough to go after you for the
showily scummy play, like the gag with Toony's readlist, but I'm also not thick enough to assume that there's no way to push a scum agenda beneath a facade of lol-I'm-so-daring shitposting.
I called you out for playing like this in the last game, and I'm calling you out on it now - that's the only real correspondence with R3 worth considering, so you can stop complaining about references to the last game. You're doing what a scum player who wants to coast through D1 on a reputation for wacky and aggressive play does. Or, in a very marginal case, a town player who thinks their years of experience and strong mechanical/reads game gives them the right to clown about and harm town D1. And hey, if it's the second, good for you I guess. That kind of self-belief would be nice to have.
And no, scumhunting you is not lazy. I wouldn't choose to deal with your nonsense if I were scum, I'd be "reluctantly" voting Tric for having posted a weak case, or trying to get Max out on a policy lynch, or voting Roden because it's just what's expected of me. Absolutely anything less frustrating than reading your prose.