Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 25

Author Topic: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network  (Read 27434 times)

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #135 on: September 14, 2019, 12:51:34 pm »

That took a while. You guys are now, formally, the Network, based on the Hub in the Asus System. I wish you guys to know that I DESPISE MoP and his ship names, they're going to make this very hard and I will give ZERO guarantees that the numeric designators you've forced upon me will be rendered accurately into the reports.

The first ships are assembled in orbit around the Hub, five ITCs and three Logos-class fast attack vessels. The Logos deploy to C and find an interestingly icy world. Scans predict that chemicals useful for continued operation may lie underneath the ice layer, accessible if the Network is willing to send some troops to secure the place before moving units in to begin mining.

ITC-01000001 deploys to Alpha, discovering that it really is a rather barren world with a mineral-rich crust and no atmosphere to impede the construction and launch to orbit of spacecraft components. Nothing remarkable occurs, though the occasional impact of an asteroid does require buildings to be built rather durably, in addition to the requirements of retaining atmosphere. Terrain secured: 4/10

ITC-01000010 deploys a BMU to Bravo. Conditions are as expected, and a few dozen units are lost to temperature-related malfunctions and incidents on the less-stable parts of the surface before execution directives are modified for unit preservation. One shuttle is badly damaged when the operating intelligence mistakenly flew too close to a volcano. Unit has been reconditioned. Terrain secured: 4/10

ITC-01000011 and two full BMUs of militarized units push to Charlie, pushing across the ice and discovering new and various hazards to be avoided via future protocol updates. Some combat engineering units deploy testing and sensor gear, confirming predictions of usable materials and the value of this planet, while general forces advance across the wastes to locate sites for industrial equipment delivery and assembly of rocket launch platforms and construction facilities. Terrain secured: 4/10

ITC-01000100 and ITC-01000101 deploy to Charlie's orbit, catching up with the FASS Mk.1s already deployed there near the end of the season. Their units are primed and ready with basic equipment, presently in storage awaiting deployment to what commanders hope will be the first contact with our "neighbors", who can only be described as the most inefficient and unoptimized beings in this entire galaxy.

It is now the Turn Two Design Phase. You have one design, please spend wisely, and also don't fail or you're going to be recycled into trash compactor units.

Spoiler: Side One Tech (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Side One Logistics (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Credits (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: October 19, 2019, 08:12:13 pm by Madman198237 »
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

Carefulrogue

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #136 on: September 18, 2019, 08:06:57 pm »

Compact Communication Kit

This is a ground to interplanetary radio kit,  with emphasis on reducing overall mass.  The specs of the design call for a collapsible dish of wires spaced for the frequency used, to facilitate ease of repair and transportation.  The connecting machinery to generate the signal will rely on miniaturization optimizations to shrink down the requirements.





And as a side note, we will be switching to hexadecimal for numeric designations of ships.  So the first 16 will be:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

If someone wants to add a standard sort of line for the ships stick it out in front, we have space for 4k ships of unique designation now.  Which you'll agree Madman, is too many.
Logged
I never thought genocide would look so cute. . .
No reason someone can be dorfed only once. An entire army of Carefulrogue! All in one coffin, it seems.
"Guys if you say 'oops sorry' afterwards it's not a war crime, right?"

Rockeater

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #137 on: September 21, 2019, 06:19:57 am »

ITC-2.0

A new transport for ground equipment using the gained knowladge from developing past projects on engine and ship design, this new ITC is larger and containing larger rockets for transporting equipment (hopefully 2 3TC ones), the way those larger rockets are capebale to to preform their job is with a much smaller vesel inside the ITC-2.0 which pull them to position to enter the atmosphere in enterence and when the rocket exist it posstions in orbit to pull it back to the ITC-2.0 when the rocket is out of the gravity well.
Quote from: Votes
ITC-2.0:(1) Rockeater
« Last Edit: September 22, 2019, 10:34:48 pm by Rockeater »
Logged
Damnit people, this is why I said to keep the truce. Because now everyone's ganging up on the cats.
Also, don't forget to contact your local Eldritch Being(s), so that they can help with our mission to destroy the universe.

Failbird105

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #138 on: September 23, 2019, 04:59:48 am »

So I don't have discord access right now, but I just want to bring up the idea: Should we perhaps look into the development of specialized Mechanica bodies for combat?
Logged

Rockeater

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #139 on: September 23, 2019, 05:06:01 am »

Could be useful, having armour while saving on space, but I would still vote now for increased size of the pods.
Logged
Damnit people, this is why I said to keep the truce. Because now everyone's ganging up on the cats.
Also, don't forget to contact your local Eldritch Being(s), so that they can help with our mission to destroy the universe.

Carefulrogue

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #140 on: September 23, 2019, 11:23:18 am »

Process ID: 51681074

Status: paused

cat PID(51681074)

Quote
HUB-class Cargo Vessel
Designed to be a replacement vessel for the ITC.  Without cargo the craft's center of mass is heavily weighted towards the back, where the engines, fuel tanks, and command modules have been placed in the specifications.  The cargo it will be hauling will instead be anchored to the spine reaching out in front, allowing large and bulky cargo, provided they can be anchored down and not be sheared off by the forces in the void.  Machine support modules could be connected in chains near the head to leech excess power from the reactor and engines for it's system sustainment.  Theoretically there should be no limit to the bulk of the craft, only the strength of the connections limiting the net mass to the sheer strength.  Parasite ships could also be docked either as passenger or utility vessels.

Logged
I never thought genocide would look so cute. . .
No reason someone can be dorfed only once. An entire army of Carefulrogue! All in one coffin, it seems.
"Guys if you say 'oops sorry' afterwards it's not a war crime, right?"

Carefulrogue

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #141 on: September 24, 2019, 02:35:47 pm »

Quote
Large Item Flight Transport (LIFT)
Before we can consider larger freighters, greater utilization of the space aboard our current ships is necessary.  PID 43289922 has been working on the shuttle craft used in association with the ITC.  Simplicity is considered the best option.  Reduce the weight of systems, cutting anything unnecessary, and increase the size of the engines, to compensate for 4 times the capacity. 

EDIT:
Quote from: Box
ORIGINS:
Designs
LIFT: (1) Carefulrogue
ITC-2.0: (1) Rockeater
HUB Cargo Vessel: (0)
« Last Edit: September 24, 2019, 05:05:25 pm by Carefulrogue »
Logged
I never thought genocide would look so cute. . .
No reason someone can be dorfed only once. An entire army of Carefulrogue! All in one coffin, it seems.
"Guys if you say 'oops sorry' afterwards it's not a war crime, right?"

Rockeater

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #142 on: September 24, 2019, 05:08:33 pm »


Quote from: Box
ORIGINS:
Designs
LIFT: (2) Carefulrogue, Rockeater
ITC-2.0: (0)
HUB Cargo Vessel: (0)
Logged
Damnit people, this is why I said to keep the truce. Because now everyone's ganging up on the cats.
Also, don't forget to contact your local Eldritch Being(s), so that they can help with our mission to destroy the universe.

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #143 on: September 29, 2019, 05:17:03 pm »

Large Item Flight Transport (LIFT)
Before we can consider larger freighters, greater utilization of the space aboard our current ships is necessary.  PID 43289922 has been working on the shuttle craft used in association with the ITC.  Simplicity is considered the best option.  Reduce the weight of systems, cutting anything unnecessary, and increase the size of the engines, to compensate for 4 times the capacity.

Quote
Large Item Flight Transport (LIFT)
Difficulty: Easy
Roll: 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 Below Average

Sometimes, simplicity really is the best of options. LIFT has been a reasonable success despite chronic underperformance in literally every unit assigned to the project. The project has produced a shuttlecraft capable of moving 4TC objects, though admittedly the extreme increases in size have reduced the speed of the shuttles, the number of times they can deploy to and from a planetary surface (limiting their use as transport craft for troops on planets), and also reducing the number of shuttles provided to each ITC. However, this is obviously more than compensated for by the fact that troops and equipment now arrive in more concentrated formations----scattered deployments in small shuttles are a thing of the past for our combat units.

It is a good thing that combat units don't need amenities much, though, as the new shuttles have almost none. This does result in mechanical issues being present in some less-critical systems, but in general the craft is capable of getting down to the surface and back to orbit without problems. Being engaged in combat, however, would be a bad idea, as the loss of one shuttle represents a rather larger loss of equipment and combat units, and also reduces the mother ship's transport capacity significantly.

LIFT shuttles do raise the cost of an ITC by 1, representing their larger size and the greater complexity of their engines.

It is now the Turn Two Revision Phase. You have one revision. Luck was with you this turn---had you designed anything more complicated that 3 might've hurt. But since you're all chronically lazy, you got away fine.

Spoiler: Side One Tech (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Side One Logistics (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Credits (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: October 19, 2019, 08:12:30 pm by Madman198237 »
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

Doomblade187

  • Bay Watcher
  • Requires music to get through the working day.
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #144 on: September 29, 2019, 05:34:01 pm »

Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms

The standard issue plasma engine suffers from high power consumption rates. By learning from our own nature and using our hard-coded knack for algorithms and programmatic improvement, we hope to better focus the plasma jet and improve plasma chamber efficiency by optimizing the electromagnetic fields utilized for containment.
Logged
In any case it would be a battle of critical thinking and I refuse to fight an unarmed individual.
One mustn't stare into the pathos, lest one become Pathos.

Rockeater

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #145 on: October 03, 2019, 09:49:28 am »

Quote from: Votes
Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms:(1) Rockeater
Logged
Damnit people, this is why I said to keep the truce. Because now everyone's ganging up on the cats.
Also, don't forget to contact your local Eldritch Being(s), so that they can help with our mission to destroy the universe.

Carefulrogue

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #146 on: October 03, 2019, 10:36:01 am »

Quote from: Votes
Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms:(2) Rockeater, Carefulrogue
Logged
I never thought genocide would look so cute. . .
No reason someone can be dorfed only once. An entire army of Carefulrogue! All in one coffin, it seems.
"Guys if you say 'oops sorry' afterwards it's not a war crime, right?"

Failbird105

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #147 on: October 03, 2019, 01:30:46 pm »

Quote from: Votes
Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms:(3) Rockeater, Carefulrogue, Failbird
Logged

Man of Paper

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #148 on: October 14, 2019, 09:20:24 pm »

So while the plasma engine upgrade is not a bad idea, it won't fix any issues with our shuttle upgrade that notably runs on chemical engines. The revision increased size, not type, so here's an option for that. I'm also a proponent of seeing how our current engine and craft fare against our opponent, since the ship itself seems like it doesn't need much of an upgrade yet. Then again, we got nothing to compare it to. I'd just like to imagine it's a solid ship.


Proposal: Intraplanetary Plasma Engine
The IPE is a more power-efficient Plasma Engine than the one we currently field, capable of providing more thrust than it's interplanetary cousin. It is designed to be used in-atmosphere on shuttles and whatever aircraft we may decide to construct. Standardizing the type of equipment we use across our military should make logistics and mechanical care less of a hassle.

The ultimate goal of the IPE project is to provide our LIFTs with stronger engines that take up less space, allowing for more rapid redeployment as well as some of the basic amenities for our combat units.

----------------

I'm half-tempted to mention the uniformity of equipment across our vessels making dealing with mechanical issues easier in the shuttle, but that seems like more a revision dedicated to the lift itself. It might be viable to tack that on as a side-effect of the engine upgrade, but eh, who knows?


Quote from: Votes
Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms:(3) Rockeater, Carefulrogue, Failbird
Intraplanetary Plasma Engine:(1) MoP
« Last Edit: October 16, 2019, 02:32:55 pm by Man of Paper »
Logged

Carefulrogue

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Interplanetary Arms Race: The Network
« Reply #149 on: October 14, 2019, 09:32:04 pm »


I'm half-tempted to mention the uniformity of equipment across our vessels making dealing with mechanical issues easier in the shuttle, but that seems like more a revision dedicated to the lift itself. It might be viable to tack that on as a side-effect of the engine upgrade, but eh, who knows?
Maybe.  I kinda think at this point a lot of our equipment is fairly standardized across models, unless there is something not mentioned.  We will probably become our own worst agent in this regard.

otherwise, It looks good.  Usually the term I've seen in regards to engines though is "thrust to weight ratio", though "power-to-weight ratio" also exists as a term.  We want more power relative to the weight of the engine.

Quote from: Votes
Plasma Magnetic Bottling Algorithms:(2) Rockeater, Failbird
Intraplanetary Plasma Engine:(2 MoP, Carefulrogue
Logged
I never thought genocide would look so cute. . .
No reason someone can be dorfed only once. An entire army of Carefulrogue! All in one coffin, it seems.
"Guys if you say 'oops sorry' afterwards it's not a war crime, right?"
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 25