Because I really don't want anyone to have it,
Also.
Right, new stuff.
Mafia lead- Caz, MaxSpin, Webaddict.
Town Leans- Hector, now heydude.
Icytea, says he'll roleblock. Someone track him tonight to see if he actually goes out somewhere.
Also, an unblockable item is best served with a 0$ bid. That and a lynch to end the day before it's sold. Destroy the Item!
Caz and you. So, how do I scumhunt you, it's not like you're being overly active.
That's not so easy, but I do get that vibe off you. And Caz for that 50$ bid. Amongst other things.
You know, I heard this story once. There was the guy, and he loved gardening. He used to have a decent garden. But, one day, his garden's all dead. The guy thinks his neighbor did it. So, he just sort of watched his neighbor all day and got really bitter. He saw a lot of things that bothered him about the neighbor. He's pretty sure that bag of something wasn't there before. Sometimes, the neighbor pours some weird stuff on the guy's lawn.
Everyone in the neighborhood walks past the guy's house with the dead garden out front. One day he dies and the cops confiscate everything. Everyone shakes their head and tsks about how far he had fallen.
Point is, that's not scumhunting. That's you saying something is off about people. Hence why I asked for more information:
Right, new stuff.
Mafia lead- Caz, MaxSpin, Webaddict.
Town Leans- Hector, now heydude.
Icytea, says he'll roleblock. Someone track him tonight to see if he actually goes out somewhere.
Also, an unblockable item is best served with a 0$ bid. That and a lynch to end the day before it's sold. Destroy the Item!
Cool, before we get too far away, you wanna list some reasons why? Since leaving little bits like this are nice when they contain reasoning, ya dig? I like knowing what you're pointing out so I can verily destroy it, lest it fester like a gangrenous wound. Also, you are voting for Maximum Spin for no real reason either. Wanna bandwagon using someone else's reason, or are we playing the long con of pseudo lurking?
Also, it's one d. webadict.
You do realize that I pay attention, right? You only posted reasons for why you're voting Maximum Spin. You posteed nothing about Caz or me.
Which leads me to my next question: If you do not somehow believe I am contributing at 100%, then why would you not ask me questions to force more participation? From Caz or me? What exactly is it that is setting off your scum-radar? You've just got a feeling, right? But WHY?
If you believe I'm scum, then I'm clearly doing something scummy. Are my arguments flawed? Perhaps my actions point towards a scummy attitude? Maybe I've dropped a particular word or phrase that hints and more sinister meanings?
And if you have no evidence, you're not trying to get it. So, why is it that I, the guy who's scummy in your eyes, have to prod you, someone who would know that they themselves are Town if they were, to actually scumhunt your targets, who AGAIN should be someone you think is scum? Because, obviously, I'm not "overly active" in your words:
it's not like you're being overly active.
In a bit of unfortunate coincidence, I was going to try to debunk your statement with Lurker Tracker, but it appears that it is now down. If I had to guess, I would be in the top two players in regards to posts, so I'm not entirely sure how I would be slacking in the active department. Perhaps you would be willing to state that I'm activelurking in regards to my posts having a lack of content? All I'm really looking for are some statements that can be put onto the record, especially so that they can categorically be compared in depth to my sufficiently lacking posts and what with my own accusations of your rather non-existent play.
I suppose I'd be apt to call projection, would I not?
In conclusion,
you are scum. You do the scummy things of:
- Activelurking
- Failing to scumhunt
- Bandwagoning
- Lacking evidence
- Accusing others who accuse you
- Projection
Does this sum up everything for you? Or would you prefer to call me a toxic presence in order to rile me up a bit more and continue some sort of never-ending cycle? Is this the way we solve problems? Because I solve mine with evidence. Go on, try me. I'm making some pretty brazen accusations. Feel free to claim OMGUS even. It's a freebie.