No, you're the scum team and are unable to keep your actions from matching your words.
I can say for certain that I'm not mafia. Can't say the same for BHK. Unable to keep my actions from matching my words... did you mean unable to keep my actions matching my words? Something doesn't add up here.
BHK claimed suvivor - a role that needs to survive 'til the end best achieved by not alienating either of the two main factions, claimed on D1 - but asked you to block the only player we know of that can mess with scum big time. The blocked player can kill scum and steal their kill. This does not make sense for a benign third-party.
Randomgenericusername explicitly said that he wasn't going to use that kill.
Huh. Checking the quicktopic, BHK never did tell me why he wanted me to roleblock randomgenricusername. I think I'd like that question answered too, actually.
You accepted this, despite said player outright stating that they're going to help you win the game.
I'm rethinking. It's possible that BHK was scum trying to sabotage me and the town.
You have twice encouraged same player to use that 1-shot anti-scum kill on a player you think still has a multi-shot revive, thus wasting it.
It would also steal any mafiakill abilities you hypothetically have, regardless of whether or not you stay dead. Proving that you're scum.
You lead the town to lynch a player that claimed unlynchable, after that player had been shown to be unlynchable, wasting one of the two lynches we've had so far.
What with what web's said, we still have no proof you're actually unlynchable instead of just being able to revive multiple times. I mean, I wish we lynched someone else in hindsight, but hindsight is 20/20.
You are trying to weaken the town further, despite claiming you've won and thus not needing to do this, and that essentially you're going to keep doing it just to polish your ego.
Are you ignoring randomgnericusername's plan to pay me with his ability factory? And the stuff I've said about wanting additional abilities for options?
You think I'm untrustworthy because of a burden of proficiency on my part, despite the fact that more or less half the players in the game haven't posted a great deal on this game day, and I'm engaging with the rest.
Not just that, there's also the shenanigans on Day 1, your tunneling of the town's most potent asset(me)... I mean look at it this way: if there was a townie you knew had two role blocks and was unkillable, you'd be busy planning how to use them. Since I'm a third party willing to help town instead, I get tunneled.
You attempted to placate me here 'cause you're worried I'll be able to influence the town to lynch you, which will essentially confirm your partner as scum.
I am trying to placate you, because I don't want to be lynched, because that ends my ability to affect the game.
Basically ‘cause I was worried that me claiming what I did would influence the many blockers to claim they blocked me, which would be problematic because...
... I didn’t act during the night.
Well there goes that. Why didn't you act?
Also, this could very easily be a lie covering up for you using the mafiakill.
Or FoU because fancy shrill peacock maneuver of business marketeering
Now I'm debating whether I'm more a cat or a peacock.
~~~
~~~
~~~
So hector. If I was telling the truth, how would you use my services(already hypothetically paid for by RGU)?