This is when we get a good look at our mourners, with their wide array of colored hairs of varying length, dressed in cowboy hats, short skirts, and long stockings.
“Uyu… Who killed Webley-san? u.u”[/i]
Closing Music
This is my fault, if that wasn't obvious.
That answers your question too, Persus13.
I'm curious to what degree my theme made it into everyone's role flavor, though.
...what did I just listen to.
It seems like either you were the only person who listened to the music, or this is somehow par for the course.
Now, to start the game talking to the person I'm sure I'll spend the rest of the game bickering and/or allying with...
Doll: You're a cop in this BYOR with a guilty result on someone. Do you claim, and what circumstances would change your answer?
sumimasen, I'll be dead soon, you'll have to go on without me.
Unless I kill you, of course.
Sure, I'll claim.
I'm fullclaiming this Day1, and quite early into it too, so that'll be fun, eh?
Also outside of outlandish role circumstances (my role is pretty outlandish, so that's hardly an outlandish scenario) I'd claim as soon as a I got a guilty anyway.
You know how much I love to drop my role on the table.
Doll: You are town with a unlimited-use flavor-inspect and a 1-shot role inspect, when do you use the role-inspect? when do you claim? how would this change if the use numbers were reversed?
I am town with an unlimited-use something (actually, lots of unlimited-use things) but that's now what you mean because I'm not restricted by the action economy, nano ne.
I role-inspect N1 because the sooner I don't need to dodge the scumkill the sooner I can take full control of the town and force things my way. I appreciate that a lot of scum on B12 might not claim their flavor but that's a rookie's mistake imo so I'm hardly concerned by it anyway (anyone who slips like that will slip a thousand times more around role claiming time) so the flavor inspect is virtually useless to me anyway.
And last because it actually involves some work:
And so it starts.
A claim: My theme is the balance of threat, a concept from my field of study, international relations. Yes, my theme is the apparent basis of the title flabort did not get.
Why am I claiming this? Because.
doll: As our resident expert on pre-game discussion analysis, what do you make of the above?
For reference, I hadn't analyzed the pre-game. Taking active part in the pre-game to try to win involves planting hooks which someone will think back on in response to certain events (like rolling scum, for the obvious one) and changes in behavior, either direct (asking about an unpursued line of inquiry) or otherwise, should give me some idea what hooks stuck and which didn't.
I didn't do that because it's tedious and boring and I wouldn't have had time for it anyway. Similarly, I don't bah-post because the only reason to do so (vis-a-vis playing to win) is to actually manipulate the game with spectral wifom etc.
I've actually got a pretty good answer for this question, surprisingly:
Bay12 players in general read far too much into the importance of a role's name in relation to it's actual mechanics and flavor. Role names have no actual inherent connection to mechanics, you know? But this is a holdover, I suspect, from bastard mafia games where flavor is essential to figuring out how to play.
With this in mind, claiming your theme is therefore something a staunch B12 player swimming in the culture of the site such as yourself might think of as a bit raunchy and ambitious. It's not though.
It's clear that you set up this question beforehand. The towniness of the question is therefore very minimal; it's effectively neutral. I'd lean towards saying that scum might not be quite so honest in the sense that sinx isn't quite x when x is equal to zero.
That said, as a tool to harass 4maskwolf and to get me to prattle on, it's quite practical, so it is a good RVS question.
Congrats, you're not useless.
You're probably town.
I guess I won't kill you tonight.
Also you contradicted a lot of what I wrote above before I wrote it but I hadn't actually read that (and wouldn't have if I had replied faster) so it's all a bit too much of a bother to go back over it, dawa.