Wowzers Bumber, how much Kool-Aid have you drank?
Not as much as you, likely.
The first link is an advert for a book.
The laptop being verified as Hunter’s laptop /=/ the (2 out of 128,000!) emails saying what they say they do.
As if you know what they say, having already dismissed them offhand. For instance, there's one that discusses a deal (which fell through) where Hunter would hold 10(% stake) for the "Big Guy". It was recently revealed (through FBI sources) that the owner of Burisma referred to VP Joe Biden as the Big Guy and was alleged to have given him a $5 million bribe (plus another $5 million for Hunter) through shell companies years before the laptop was seized or mentioned.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/joe-biden-referred-big-guy-dealings-with-ukraine-china-fbi-recordBLM rioters were not instructed by the Democratic president to storm the capitol, like Trump did when he got upset over losing a democratic vote.
Trump never said to storm the capitol. Nice try.
An FBI sting does not a federal conspiracy make, Jesus why does that need to be spelled out?
They found a bunch of losers talking shit, set them into motion on a plan that existed outside the fantasy realm, and then provided them with fake bombs for the bridge plan the FBI came up with. One of the plans the "terrorists" came up with was to put Whitmer on a boat and hope nobody rescued her, or something. If you're determined to have blind faith in the FBI, then there's nothing else I can say.
Republican parents where using violence and intimidation tactics to force administrators and school boards who disagreed with them to quit,
Which would normally be a matter for local police...
in much the same way that they used them to force election officials from their positions after Trump saying the election was rigged. Still waiting for that evidence three years hence.
Who was forced out of their position?
Pretty sure an audit of voting machines (+software) was denied because the SC was unwilling to give the election to Trump even if fraud was later found. It's a double moot point after the electoral votes were certified.
Nancy Pelosi asks a question, doesn’t actually tell people to go out and commit violence like the orange buffoon.
I'm sure you have that quote from the orange guy handy, then.
Louis Farrakhan isn’t a democratic politician.
He was very close to a lot of them, including Obama. Besides that there's Illhan "All about the Benjamins" Omar.
Republicans also said make mandates were unnecessary for an airborne virus that was putting severe pressure on health services across the world, the effects of which are still felt, and pushed conspiracy theories that a billionaire philanthropist was putting microchips in all the vaccines.
Ah, yes, those ever-effective masks. The ones where the droplets just...
go around them and enter the surrounding air. (Remember, Dr. "I am the Science" Fauci was the first to deny mask effectiveness because he wanted to save the N-95's for healthcare workers.)
Nobody quite to the level of Biden and Kamala was talking about microchips. More about the experimental mRNA tech, which is kind of what Biden/Kamala did.
Tell me when a democratic president encouraged their supporters to March in the capitol because they were butthurt they lost an election and refused to sign off on sending people in to deal with it for hours?
I don't know of any president that told anyone to march "in" the capitol, but Trump approved troops days before (because he thought antifa would harass his followers,) and was turned down.
Harris and Biden being cautious over vaccines approved by a man who suggest sunlight and bleach should be investigated as means of dealing with the virus, and constantly failed against expert advice during the pandemic is… I mean common sense doesn’t cover it really.
Sunlight and bleach? You mean UV light and unspecified disinfectant?
Expert advice? No, none of the "experts" had a clue. Trump shut down travel from China early (but not early enough) despite being told it was unnecessary and that he was a xenophobe for it. (Meanwhile,
Pelosi said come on down to Chinatown.)
Right. Burisma being corrupt has… what to do with Joe Biden? I mean we’re back to the laptop here. Hunter getting a job because he happens to have the family name “Biden” doesn’t mean Joe Biden is corrupt. Unless of course your argument is that Europe, the IMF, and anti-corruption NGOs in Ukraine were also in on trying to keep Hunter away from prosecution?
It strains credibility when Joe says he never talked business with Hunter when they're photographed together with Hunter's business partners.
Devon Archer (2014)Carlos Slim (2015)Biden can come up with any justification he wants to get others on board with his decision. His family stood to gain from the successor that we now know ended the investigations with no serious charges.
I mean, just looking at the Matt Gaetz wikipedia page… On April 9, 2021, the House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into allegations that Gaetz "may have engaged in sexual misconduct and/or illicit drug use, shared inappropriate images or videos on the House floor, misused state identification records, converted campaign funds to personal use, and/or accepted a bribe, improper gratuity, or impermissible gift".[282] The committee deferred its investigation at the request of the Justice Department, but resumed it in June 2023.[283]
Sounds like a saint.
Could've sworn the goalposts were at "party unilaterally looked away from rapist" a second ago...
Tom Tuberville, the Republican refusing to confirm hundreds of appointments to mikitary leadership positions over a policy they have of paying for travel to get abortions, until very recently said that white nationalists weren’t racists, but just American. It also took
Later that day, his Congressional staff released a statement that said Tuberville "was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military, not that he believes they should be in the military."
In short, yeah, Democrats are idiots, they’re human. Most assuredly the least bad option of the two choices available though.
In your opinion. The party of "always bigger government" isn't exactly appealing for a libertarian. The uniparty is bad enough without everyone jumping on board, thanks.
There are bits I missed. Trump legitimizing Kim as a tinpot dictator and making other tiny dictators realise the way to be taken seriously is to develop nuclear weapons.
The nukes legitimized him. Kind of hard to ignore.
Also Trump trashing the deal that stopped Iran developing nukes, like a genius.
We're past the date it was due to expire. They were still developing ballistic missiles and funding terror using the money we returned to them.
Also, painting on churches isn't campaigning.
(Nor is attempted arson. They also went after pregnancy centers, which force people to undergo anti-abortions, or something.)
Packing the court. Unconstitutional debt relief plan. Take your pick.
Hyperbole my ass.
Rather than adopting a new party platform,[94] the Republicans decided simply to recycle their 2016 party platform,[95] including several references to the "current president" and attacks on "the administration" (which in 2016 referred to Barack Obama and the Obama administration).[96] The decision was criticized by Republican activists.[97] In a tweet, Trump said that he would "prefer a new and updated platform, short form, if possible."[98]
The RNC did not do this, just issuing a one-page document stating opposition to the "Obama/Biden administration" and supporting President Trump's instead.[99][100]
So by "'unilaterally support the president' and nothing else", you meant "support all the things the president ran on that are popular with the voting base" but stated in short form because someone was lazy and did a copy-paste, and still couldn't be bothered to write a new one after they were called out?
Here's the NYMag, your favorite rag on the matter: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/08/republican-national-committee-2020-platform-trump.html
Funny.
I am not reading your link vomit.
Nobody asked. Don't talk to me or my links ever again.
Author
Topic: AmeriPol thread (Read 4437333 times)