Two wrongs don't make right.
Now wait a minute here.
It is not authoritarian for the Supreme Court to allow states to murder their citizens via ectopic pregnancy*, with a decision 70% are against, nor is it authoritarian for states to give the order. States Rights! And they can point to some part of the constitution that they interpret to say this is all fine and legal.
It would be authoritarianism, and thus immoral, for the president to fight the states on this by opening abortion clinics in states via executive order.
That's nearly equivalent to saying I can't jaywalk across the street to stop someone from mugging grandma.
Using executive orders to get things done over congressional gridlock wouldn't even be a new precedent, it's plenty well-established by this point.
*No, they're not always lethal if allowed to grow until they start rupturing organs, but it's a much higher mortality rate for nothing, so the point still stands. There is nothing good about banning early treatment of ectopic pregnancy even if you think babies have souls at conception that burn forever if aborted, and thanks to this new decision, that's where we can now draw the line for arguments. The abortion discussion is no longer about "When are embryos alive," or "do we need to save them," things have moved to "saving women from ectopic pregnancies is illegal, and also just for fun, miscarrying is murder."
**I realize nobody's really arguing these. I'm not really arguing against anyone with most of this. I started to, then I shifted into shouting into the void against generic rhetoric to vent my own frustrations.