Would I be adding anything of value to this post if I wrote another paragraph describing the terribleness of their actions? Of course not. I want to know why that teacher simply stared back at me the whole time. The conflict of values between the bully and I is settled. There's nothing to say. But boy would I ever have some words with that teacher if I ever saw him again.
And so in conversation you spend most of your time talking about the bystanders and faculty? Do you not get how that can come across as doing the
exact same thing as those folks? If third parties come in and see folks doing little but throwing shade at people other than the bullies, they're going to start thinking the people talking like that don't actually have much of a problem with the bullies, or that somehow what the bystanders are doing is as bad as the fucker shanking you in the gut.
We've seen, repeatedly, what happens when we give less air to the worse misdeeds than we do to the lesser. People start fucking equivocating or ignoring them. Of bloody
course adding that extra paragraph, and goddamn hammering that it's extra shit, adds value. It puts your weight of words and efforts where goddamn hopefully your desires are.
Winning the fight against shitty Democrats is step 1 to having the ability to fight even shittier Republicans.
It's just a fight we've friggin'
lost this cycle, y'know? Bernie got goddamn crushed by a more moderate presenting candidate,
again. Down ballot's largely been doing pretty badly, too, from what I understand. When in shit creek, either don't try to undermine the closest thing you have to a sandbar, or at bloody
least save a balance of your efforts for dumping what you're digging out on the deeper parts, is most of what I'm saying. Otherwise you're probably just fucked with not even limited recourse, and folks start thinking the sandbar is somehow worse than actively drowning in shit.