I'm not sure, the Russian hacking is based from reports by the intelligence agencies, whereas that story is in 'aim.org' and cites pjmedia as it's source. 'Aim.org' should be taken with a grain of salt. When one of their header tabs is "Benghazi" then you know you have a winner right there. One of their headlines is
"The Red Diaper Baby in Obama’s Red Cover-Up":
The shocking truth can finally be told. His parents, Elliott and Mary Maraniss, along with Davis, were members of the same international conspiracy which had groomed Obama for the presidency, in order to hasten the decline and destruction of the United States.
^ And I didn't even have to
search to find this. Open aim.org, click "CIJ Reports" and it's the third link on that page.
"Aim" claims to be a media watchdog against liberal media, except it's just a clearinghouse for bizarre conspiracy theories and "news of the world" level tabloid stuff. Compare that to Media Matters, which is a liberal watchdog of conservative news. Except everything Media Matters says is true: they just state what the conservatives are saying and basically let you make up your own mind about the spin.
So, it's crazy loon fringe websites saying that Obama Communist stuff, as opposed to reports coming out of over a dozen established intelligence agencies on the other side. Sure, both are saying that the Russians are trying to influence the USA, but the sources and information content are completely different, not "perfect symmetry" whatsoever.