While the Hitler comparison might be a bit extreme, I can't think of a better one.
Mussolini has a similarly stupid face.
Honestly, the Manafort thing and Trump's huge campaign issues are the biggest arguments against him being President. Not that all the other things aren't terribad in their own way, but the sheer incompetence we see indicates that a Trump cabinet would be similarly incompetent, and ruled by the same sort of power-struggles that Bush Jr. suffered. I mean, the same issues that he has in the campaign would apply to any cabinet: no one serious wants to taint themselves with him, so he ends up with a very low bar for entry and ruled by ideologues with little experience or who've been out of the game for years. Part of being President is a huge amount of delegating to competent administrators; do you think Trump has competent administrators to bring in?
I mean Trump could easily end up parading himself around for four years while offending every human alive, while his lackeys run rampant and unleash hell.
Gun control advocates say the government will protect you, but that's just a bald-faced lie. When the government just stands down and lets rioters rule the streets, it's a good idea to have a gun around.
It's extremely good for an
individual to have a gun around, but from the perspective of society, it is NOT good to add guns to riots. This is a conflict between public and private good.
On the topic of vetting, do we not already do vetting? I mean we vet plenty already. Hell I have a document on file from the FBI telling my grandfather that he would be deported for voluntary membership in a communist party in his country of origin. It didn't stick (only because of the intervention of certain interested parties), but there is already precedent for denying people entry on the basis of authoritarianism. In fact, that law is still on the books today.