hector13. Bandwagoning scum.
I'm not the only person to have jumped on that bandwagon though, and scum is hardly the only alignment that bandwagons. Are you only not voting for EP because you need a reason to vote for me to tie up the vote?
Now, you're saying I'm scum here, but haven't really provided any evidence of such. Perhaps you'd like to share, with quotes?
Responses:
Claim's the name is red. For 100% of the games so far, the Evil role has been in red.
One: the Round of Hands, in which Evils were functionally town. Two: bastard mod. Three: Round 20, in which an Evil needed to side with town. Against you.
Role-fishing, and hopeful speculation. Does anyone else have a monster as their flavour? I don't.
Of course not, you have some sort of dream creature as your flavor. In any case, refer to round 20. A "evil" within the town that actually needs to side with the town. That's another possibility.
Rhetorical flourish. Fancy, but contentless.
Yes? What of it?
Deflection. "oh of course it looks like I'm the Evil role, but last round there was an Evil role and a True Evil role! So even if I am Evil, I'm not the Evil, amirite?"
Bastard mod. And Round 20. So, no, not deflection, reasoning.
A survivor claim with these abilities does not make sense. A survivor merely has to live 'til the end. If they have a disguise - which presumably will make them appear town or benign or whatever - why would they willingly give it up to perform an action that has nothing to do with their wincon?
Assume a True Evil that needs all players other than him dead in order to win, clashing with the survivor wincon.
So your defense (or attack?) is "the rules were
x in a previous round, and this is a bastard game, so I obviously can't be the Evil role in this round, even though it really looks like it."?
You're not getting out of this without a claim, hector.
I'm not going to claim whether or not I "get out of this". I've already said I'm not going to claim, so any claim I do make isn't going to be trusted, and even if I did claim, I'm sure you'd find a way to say I'm not standing by what I said earlier and make it look scummy.
Looking at it another way, everyone else has more or less claimed, and there is also the idea that there's a particular actor present that is the only one that can take out the Evil role. It could very well be that I am that particular actor and don't want to reveal such to an Evil killer, or it could very well be that I am not that particular actor, but that I'm convinced that I am town and would be alright with the Evil killer taking me out instead of that particular actor. It could very well be something completely different. Maybe I'm a Jester?
Regardless, you won't find out unless you lynch me *shrug*
I also like how you forgot to edit the FoS
Pointless speculation. Why base an argument on whether or not to lynch someone on something that can't be proven during the course of the game?
What of role flips?
What of them? I imagine that we're going to need to lynch at least two players to confirm or dismiss the theory, by which point the game will probably be over. I don't think something like that should be used as a basis on whether or not we should lynch someone - at least not to convince other players, anyway.
Then why are you arguing that FoU is a survivor? If he's a survivor analogue, then he's not Town analogue.
These are mutually exclusive conditions. A survivor is a third-party, and therefore has no reason to help town. If you insist on using this argument, then we would in fact benefit from FoU's death. A third-party very rarely wins on their own, and the meta-game for MM is essentially points collecting. If the Evil role wins, that's only one person FoU would have to share the points with in the end.
Furher, you appear to be assuming FoU is the key to town winning, despite the survivor claim. It seems a bit unfair on Town having a third-party that has no vested interest in a Town victory being the key to a Town victory, don't you think?
Refer to "Assume a True Evil that needs all players other than him to win, clashing with the survivor wincon."
In summary, your defense is "I might look like the Evil role, but someone else is probably more evil than me."?