Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Elephant Parade]

Well, I saw them going somewhere.  I don't know where.  I presume it was visiting you.

Wow, that has to be the least useful ability ever. You can tell... if your target leaves the house? And literally nothing else? I mean, in some circumstances it might help to rule out killers, but you're set up to be suspicious from the start, so...

Yeah, I'm not buying it, personally.

[FallacyofUrist]

...
No. I tracked Fish last night. He visited... nobody.

[hector13]

Soooo... what does TBF have to say 'bout that?

[TheBiggerFish]

Soooo... what does TBF have to say 'bout that?

*that is to say, my target was hector, but my action doesn't visit.

[FallacyofUrist]

Fish seems fishy.

Mainly because from what he's saying, he's just a less powerful version of me. That doesn't seem right.

[hector13]

Soooo... what does TBF have to say 'bout that?

*that is to say, my target was hector, but my action doesn't visit.

Convenient.

What's your action again, FoU?

[FallacyofUrist]

I track somebody, learning who they visit.

[hector13]

TBF: tell me why I shouldn't lynch you.

FoU: tell me why I shouldn't lynch you.

EP: tell me why I shouldn't lynch you. You are top of the list 'cause wtf are you doing to the alignment of the words man.

[FallacyofUrist]

Because I'm not scum.
Because the thing at the start of the round made it clear I was the investigator.
Because I'm useful.
Because Fish is a much better target than me.

[hector13]

Because I'm not scum.

Prove it.

Because the thing at the start of the round made it clear I was the investigator.

Bastard mod.

Because I'm useful.

How so?

Because Fish is a much better target than me.

On what grounds?

[FallacyofUrist]

Because I'm not scum.

[1] Prove it.

Because the thing at the start of the round made it clear I was the investigator.

[2] Bastard mod.

Because I'm useful.

[3] How so?

Because Fish is a much better target than me.

[4] On what grounds?

[1]: Can you prove that you're not scum? Pointless question. Unless you have a way to do that.
[2]: S'pose.
[3]: I refer you to my track ability. It should be fairly easy to verify.
[4]:

Fish seems fishy.

Mainly because from what he's saying, he's just a less powerful version of me. That doesn't seem right.

[hector13]

Because I'm not scum.

[1] Prove it.

Because the thing at the start of the round made it clear I was the investigator.

[2] Bastard mod.

Because I'm useful.

[3] How so?

Because Fish is a much better target than me.

[4] On what grounds?

[1]: Can you prove that you're not scum? Pointless question. Unless you have a way to do that.
[2]: S'pose.
[3]: I refer you to my track ability. It should be fairly easy to verify.
[4]:

Fish seems fishy.

Mainly because from what he's saying, he's just a less powerful version of me. That doesn't seem right.

1. About as pointless as saying "I'm not scum"?
3. TBF's skill is more verifiable than your ability at the moment, though the claim is weakened muchly by EP's revelation of what happened during the night.
4. There are various different types of watcher ability. Some say if someone performed an action and what that action was, some say who they performed an action on, some say if they had an action performed on them.

[FallacyofUrist]

1. About as pointless as saying "I'm not scum"?
3. TBF's skill is more verifiable than your ability at the moment, though the claim is weakened muchly by EP's revelation of what happened during the night.
4. There are various different types of watcher ability. Some say if someone performed an action and what that action was, some say who they performed an action on, some say if they had an action performed on them.

[1]: Until a method of proving me town is determined, yes.
[3]: How so(to both)? I would even say my ability is more verifiable. Fish can tell if somebody acted. I can tell if somebody acted, and who they targeted.
[4]: Then what type is Fish's?

[Elephant Parade]

EP: tell me why I shouldn't lynch you. You are top of the list 'cause wtf are you doing to the alignment of the words man.

• I think I've done a decent job of helping out the town.
• I've immediately released all information I've received, and I think most of it has been proven?
• I claimed Survivor very early (I only didn't claim it immediately because I thought it was in the round's opening post). I suppose you could argue it to be some sort of gambit, but it certainly isn't suspicious.
• And now, for the classic Hey What About These Guys? Defence: FoU has been super inactive, and TBF has been super suspicious.

[hector13]

1. About as pointless as saying "I'm not scum"?
3. TBF's skill is more verifiable than your ability at the moment, though the claim is weakened muchly by EP's revelation of what happened during the night.
4. There are various different types of watcher ability. Some say if someone performed an action and what that action was, some say who they performed an action on, some say if they had an action performed on them.

[1]: Until a method of proving me town is determined, yes.
[3]: How so(to both)? I would even say my ability is more verifiable. Fish can tell if somebody acted. I can tell if somebody acted, and who they targeted.
[4]: Then what type is Fish's?

1. It's your burden to prove it.
2. His results gel with what EP said. It is weakened because EP revealed his results before TBF.
3. Watcher. Results say if person visits or is visited.