Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[FallacyofUrist]

[1]: Entirely? But yes, I'll think on it.
[2,3]: Hm. Still seems a bit redundant with my role in play.

[hector13]

So uh... are you guys gonna discuss the game or..?

[FallacyofUrist]

I was waiting on you to comment.

[Elephant Parade]

So uh... are you guys gonna discuss the game or..?

Yeah, I was sorta expecting you to respond to my post. I suppose it's not fair to expect you to initiate all the discussions, though, even if I am pretty busy right now.

[hector13]

What do your results tell you, FoU?

[FallacyofUrist]

They told me Fish didn't visit anybody.

Less literally: It just digs him further into a hole.
His claim seems made to be hard to disprove. His action doesn't visit, so my action can't prove his claim. And it's very easy for him to say "Yeah, I found out you visited my target." based on somebody else's claim.

So he can't be verified, not easily at least.

But here's a plan: we no lynch, then have him choose somebody of our choice other than me. Then I either track or don't track that person based on a Random.org roll.
Alternatively, he targets me, then I track or don't track somebody based on a Random.org roll.

Come morning, we ask him what his results are. If they contradict what I did, you lynch him.

Perhaps not the best way, given the fact that if he guesses, he has a 50% chance of being right. But it's the plan I've got.

[hector13]

You're as reliable as he is, byraway. So... plan sucks.

[hector13]

I don't know who to lynch at this point, and I can't be the only one doing things.

So, tell me who I should lynch, and why.

[FallacyofUrist]

Now, I would prefer to use my plan. If not that, then lynch Fish.

Fish seems fishy.

Mainly because from what he's saying, he's just a less powerful version of me. That doesn't seem right.

His claim seems made to be hard to disprove. His action doesn't visit, so my action can't prove his claim. And it's very easy for him to say "Yeah, I found out you visited my target." based on somebody else's claim.

[hector13]

So, to recap today's endless reams of information, we have:

EP saying they were forced to visit me, but have no action so didn't do anything. Doesn't really make any sense, but okay.

TBF saying EP did visit someone, but not who they visited, nor if they did anything.

FoU saying TBF is lying, TBF didn't visit anyone, while TBF claims his action doesn't visit, so wouldn't show up as having done anything.

TL;DR EP visited, did nothing, TBF confirms, FoU says TBF lies.

hector has quandary. Lots of unconfirmed nonsense. I'm stuck between choosing TBF and FoU, and this feels like MYLO, so...

No Lynch

[TheBiggerFish]

Well that's a thing.

Are we even doing this plan?

[TheBiggerFish]

And what if FoU's lying, and he's, say, forcing someone to be an arsonist or some such?  I mean, it's no less unlikely.  And EP randomly visiting hector makes me think something's weirder than usual.

[hector13]

Day's over. FoU can do whatever he wants.

[TheBiggerFish]

Yes, but what is he doing?

[hector13]

Whatever the piss he wants. The plan is shite whether he does it or not

Given your persistence in wanting to know though, I imagine he'll be watching you.