Sorry to hear that, Hector, since you're my controller.
N1i was told to roleblock and stop FoU from posting. Same thing N2.
N3 I was told to target Starver. I refused.
So obviously, Hector's behind this.
With some quick logic, we can figure out that Starver was TBF's controller, but that's OK. He's dead now, so you've no one wanting to betray you.
So how come your action didn't work N2 then? FoU was posting with the rest of us on D3.
What is your action? A block
and a pretty nasty post restriction? That's removing someone for two consecutive phases of the game. It is also a claim - quite coincidentally, I'm sure - for the remaining two actions of the three that were
revealed by FoU on D3... during which time he should have been under your influence of not being able to post. He claimed he was role blocked in the same post, so what happened, hm? How does one of your actions work but not the other?
It's also a little bit suspect that you're voting for someone who was very open about the fact that
you were one of his top two scumspects. This is obviously an OMGUS and an ill-thought out claim trying to provide some context. Try again.
Through what logic can we figure out Starver was TBF's controller? You presented exactly zero evidence on that. What precludes FoU from that position?
I was told to target both FoU and syou', so it cant have been them, can it?
Or you could be lying about having a controller.
I thought it was TBF because he immediately unvoted me after I claimedthat i was a drone. But it wasnt.
Read his "controlled" action again. If you're a drone like him, how likely is it you're going to be a controller too? To paraphrase Obi-Wan Kenobi, you are not the drone he was looking for.
Equally so,
a question I really want you to answer, you are claiming a controlled action, just like TBF had. TBF was evil. What should Starver, FoU and I think about that?
tthat also answers your question
No, Moonlit, no it doesn't.
PPE: shit is getting real! Let's make this symmetrical:
Moonlit I love it.