Asking here because I've a feeling this will turn political(and sticking it in a political thread seems the right idea given that), and I originally saw this on the UK politics subreddit. (I'm beginning to think we should have a sort of "Charged but not flamey" thread)
What is it with the increasing hostility towards university? I'm seeing it more and more, where people think that universities are where the uneducated go to, and (this is where it gets political) left-leaning liberal Scientology-esque headquarters of indoctrination?
One of them takes all of your money and promises to help you learn about yourself whilst being a front for ideological indoctrination, the other is Scientology :
P
In all seriousness, Universities are where most uneducated go to... To receive education. Likewise you are incorrect that UK Universities are left-leaning, because they are not left-leaning, they are the nucleus of the entire British left-wing, with
8 out of ten lecturers being left-wing, and that proportion naturally being even higher in the humanities department. You'd have to be in the engineering department to not notice how the syllabuses are made or which way the wind blows.
I'm at university right now. The most left-leaning, liberal thing I've seen is a lone reference to Trump being the primordial ooze that life emerged from. Furthermore, dam near every politician, the world over, is university educated. INCLUDING the right-leaning, conservative/reactionary ones. And universities (excluding the diploma mill style ones) actually require an education.
My Uni was the centre of a Labour think-tank, once held the annual record for exporting British jihadists, was thronged with momentum activists running about attacking leftists for not being leftist enough e.t.c.
It's telling for example in my open days that of the politics societies the student union allowed the marxist soc, fem soc, green, libdem, labour, socialists e.t.c. all tables but not the conservatives, whose society was allowed no table. Most of all my seminars were dominated by 3 or 4 people while the rest sat in silence, too scared to say anything which wouldn't survive intersectionality without controversy. I thoroughly enjoyed this atmosphere, but by no objective measure could you observe this as impartial, anymore than a man whose stepped on a landmine with his left leg is a well-balanced and upright man. The conflict isn't even between right and left wing at University, because the right wing has been so thoroughly disarmed and thrashed in that regard that their presence is pitiful and pathetic. You will find Marxism on the marking syllabuses of GCSEs. It is a conflict between leftist liberals and younger leftists dissatisfied with the old guard's status quo, attacking pioneering progressives for being terfs, zionists, neoliberals, racist e.t.c.
Regarding politicians, there is a clear difference between which politicians went to University, what they studied and how involved they were with campus life. Whether they studied PPE and left more Thatcherite, or they studied Drama and left more Marxist, or they kept their distance from campus life altogether - one's environment in those years does shape things considerably for those in their younger formative years. By contrast mature students who are working a full time job whilst studying for their degree are considerably less affected and involved. And of those who are workmen, it is worth mentioning the likes of Nigel Farage for example, have never been to University. Whether that is because University drills these notions out of students or if University selects against people of those views is up to you to decide, I personally never wrote a right-wing essay in my life out of the certain knowledge it'd be received poorly.
I can't help but feel, myself, this is part of the backlash against experts that appears to be cropping up in the West. Some idea that they're all idiots that have no idea what they're doing, that they're virtue signallers, that they're working for their own benefit, and that all they do is play identity politics. And since universities churn out experts...
Universities churn out graduates, not experts. A tremendous deal of issue with "experts" is that they are not experts, they are people who are entirely inundated with critical theory yet have never learned by experience or tested the validity of anything they believe in through actual work. Rather like someone with a strategic business management degree who comes up with a 120 point plan for an issue which could be resolved with 1. Otherwise yes, the above points you and I have mentioned are precisely the criticism.
Although it does need decoupling from Islam
That's like saying Christmas need decoupling from Christianity. It doesn't matter if it came from some other religion or culture a thousand years ago, Islam is the main proponent of it today.
It isn't like that at all, Christmas is a holiday spread across all Christian branches and sects. The burqa is an Arab tradition, its enforcement a wahhabi doctrine, and this has caused much consternation to Muslims from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia & Malaysia for example who have faced discrimination for being Ajams. Trying to pretend that Wahhabists in Saudi Arabia represent billions of people is not helpful.
*EDIT
You've reminded me of one of the things that made my blood boil the most in the Brexit referendum. Politicians saying "we're tired of listening to experts". THEY'RE FUCKING EXPERTS, YOU VEGETABLE. EXPERTS IN THEIR FIELD, THEIR FIELD SPECIFICALLY BEING ECONOMICS, POLITICS AND HOW RIDICULOUSLY FUCKED WE ARE POST-BREXIT.
I wanted to scream until my head exploded and I could be off this awful rock.
/rant
The bar for an academic expert is terribly low, for you see it's been stocked full of the scions of affluent families who send their kids off to do Politics, Philosophy & Economics to set them up for careers in fields they join at such a young age having never gained any practical or technical knowledge of anything they've done or studied. Plenty of study, research & writing, (if they hadn't been an eternal first year or spent most of their time drinking or hadn't outsourced their work to a 3rd party writer like some sneaky breeki folk do), or if they hadn't graduated after their parents donated generously to the University, and what subsequently do you have? A man in a suit who has plenty of knowledge of untested theories. You wouldn't trust them with your cash and nor I with our country, and it seems altogether idiotic to surrender your own ability to think for yourself in favour of someone who just a few years prior was downing tequila shots off of their roommates arse cheeks.
And let's be frank regarding predictions; at best, you can say they are making stochastic predictions. Which is to say, they are making assessments over possible outcomes and concluding which is the most probable one, but they cannot determine which of these predictions (if any) will be the outcome. Subsequently when experts said not joining the euro would result in the death of the UK economy for example, or when Theresa May determined she would have a landslide victory, or when experts said the Leave vote itself would be the death of the UK economy, that tomorrow will be the beginning of the end for reals this time - it doesn't turn out so. At worse, they're concluding whatever answer their patrons are searching for. Is it wise to be critical of politicians whilst obedient to experts when both are cut from the same cloth?