Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 43

Author Topic: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)  (Read 58148 times)

TheBiggerFish

  • Bay Watcher
  • Somewhere around here.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #555 on: January 21, 2016, 03:11:42 pm »
To which I say, that's your fault.
Logged
Sigtext

Quote from: Hanslanda on April 12, 2017, 09:32:01 pm
It has been determined that Trump is an average unladen swallow travelling northbound at his maximum sustainable speed of -3 Obama-cubits per second in the middle of a class 3 hurricane.

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #556 on: January 21, 2016, 03:23:50 pm »
.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2016, 06:13:22 am by penguinofhonor »
Logged

BFEL

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tail of a stinging scorpion scourge
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #557 on: January 21, 2016, 06:28:13 pm »
Quote from: hector13 on January 21, 2016, 11:57:16 am
It does seem a bit pointless putting things in a sig-text. I don't even look at them...
WHAT ABOUT MINE?
Since my signature references all the better things I have in sig-text I mean?
Logged
Quote from: Magistrum on May 19, 2015, 06:22:30 am
7/10 Has much more memorable sigs but casts them to the realm of sigtexts.

Indeed, I do this.

hector13

  • Bay Watcher
  • It’s shite being Scottish
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #558 on: January 21, 2016, 07:08:21 pm »
Quote from: BFEL on January 21, 2016, 06:28:13 pm
Quote from: hector13 on January 21, 2016, 11:57:16 am
It does seem a bit pointless putting things in a sig-text. I don't even look at them...
WHAT ABOUT MINE?
Since my signature references all the better things I have in sig-text I mean?

'cause that takes effort I'm willing to make. You could be boring for all I know :P
Logged
Quote from: MetalSlimeHunt on May 25, 2013, 11:59:58 pm
Look, we need to raise a psychopath who will murder God, we have no time to be spending on cooking.

If you struggle with your mental health, please seek help.

Shook

  • Bay Watcher
  • ◦ ◡ ◦
    • View Profile
    • DeviantArt page
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #559 on: January 21, 2016, 07:15:26 pm »
SO I WATCHED THIS MOVIE TODAY

I was astounded to find out that the most elegant melee combatant was a stormtrooper with a big-ass stun baton. I also couldn't help but crack a smile when i witnessed space hitler the First Order ham general DEVOURING the entire goddamn planet during his speech before the biggest shoota fired. Also, Finn really should get his compulsive lying checked out. :v
All in all, great movie, i enjoyed it enough to hold my bladder for the entire length of it. I also enjoyed seeing Kylo getting his arse kicked, because he's a dick.
Logged
Twitter i guess
also deviantART page
Quote from: Girlinhat
It may be worthwhile to have the babies fall into ring of fortifications or windows, to prevent anyone from catching and saving them.
Quote
[01:27] <Octomobile> MMM THATS GOOD FIST BUTTER

Insanegame27

  • Bay Watcher
  • Now versio- I mean, age 18. Honestly not an AI.
    • View Profile
    • Steam ID
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #560 on: January 21, 2016, 07:21:16 pm »
Favorite line from Han, "Women always find out the truth"
Logged
Power/metagaming RL since Birth/Born to do it.
Quote from: Second Amendment
A militia cannot function properly without arms, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The military cannot function without tanks and warplanes, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear tanks and warplanes, shall not be infringed.
The military cannot function without ICBMs, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear ICBMs, shall not be infringed.

SOLDIER First

  • Bay Watcher
  • Trans fucking rights, baby.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #561 on: January 21, 2016, 08:00:10 pm »
Come on, Shook, Finn's with the Resistance. That's what they look like. Well, some of them. Others look different.
Logged
Black lives matter.

Shook

  • Bay Watcher
  • ◦ ◡ ◦
    • View Profile
    • DeviantArt page
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #562 on: January 21, 2016, 08:57:46 pm »
i refuse to believe that only some of them look like that and i demand that the entire resistance is played by John Boyega
Logged
Twitter i guess
also deviantART page
Quote from: Girlinhat
It may be worthwhile to have the babies fall into ring of fortifications or windows, to prevent anyone from catching and saving them.
Quote
[01:27] <Octomobile> MMM THATS GOOD FIST BUTTER

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #563 on: January 21, 2016, 09:38:50 pm »
Clone wars
Logged
Quote from: Loud Whispers on June 04, 2016, 07:55:42 pm
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Quote from: Cinder on July 21, 2016, 09:25:53 pm
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

hector13

  • Bay Watcher
  • It’s shite being Scottish
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #564 on: January 23, 2016, 09:29:24 am »
TR-8R's name confirmed as "Nines".

Someone mentioned it earlier, so well done.
Logged
Quote from: MetalSlimeHunt on May 25, 2013, 11:59:58 pm
Look, we need to raise a psychopath who will murder God, we have no time to be spending on cooking.

If you struggle with your mental health, please seek help.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #565 on: January 23, 2016, 04:51:44 pm »
Quote from: hector13 on January 23, 2016, 09:29:24 am
TR-8R's name confirmed as "Nines".

Someone mentioned it earlier, so well done.
That's awesome backstory there.
...
He isn't really dead, is he? :D I mean a bowcaster shot to the side of the abdomen isn't really that deadly right? Maybe it just knocked him back hard?
Logged

Egan_BW

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #566 on: January 23, 2016, 04:54:00 pm »
So far, getting hit by bowcaster is death for mooks, injury for named characters. Because the internet just helped promote Nines to named status, he retroactively survived.
Logged
I would starve tomorrow if I could eat the world today.

Insanegame27

  • Bay Watcher
  • Now versio- I mean, age 18. Honestly not an AI.
    • View Profile
    • Steam ID
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #567 on: January 23, 2016, 05:14:10 pm »
Hey, if Red vs Blue can have a character survive falling 55 floors while being crushed by 55 floors simultaneously (building implodes and falls), ie Sharkface, and have the character live, surely Star Wars can have someone survive a pimped-up-crossbow.
Logged
Power/metagaming RL since Birth/Born to do it.
Quote from: Second Amendment
A militia cannot function properly without arms, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The military cannot function without tanks and warplanes, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear tanks and warplanes, shall not be infringed.
The military cannot function without ICBMs, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear ICBMs, shall not be infringed.

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #568 on: January 23, 2016, 05:24:51 pm »
Quote from: Egan_BW on January 23, 2016, 04:54:00 pm
So far, getting hit by bowcaster is death for mooks, injury for named characters. Because the internet just helped promote Nines to named status, he retroactively survived.
He probably put on his Reactive Armour Plate the right way round, unlike pretty much every other clone/storm/order-trooper...
Logged

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #569 on: January 23, 2016, 05:28:19 pm »
Quote from: Starver on January 23, 2016, 05:24:51 pm
Quote from: Egan_BW on January 23, 2016, 04:54:00 pm
So far, getting hit by bowcaster is death for mooks, injury for named characters. Because the internet just helped promote Nines to named status, he retroactively survived.
He probably put on his Reactive Armour Plate the right way round, unlike pretty much every other clone/storm/order-trooper...

I've always wondered why they even bother with the armor, since they never portray it as protecting them from anything.
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Quote from: Vector on October 06, 2011, 03:14:08 pm
Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 43
« previous next »