Arcavisti, you've made the fewest posts in the game (other than Roo) and you didn't seem to be able to recall someone's voting habits when the game is only three pages long. Minimal engagement is scummy.
Yeah, I've been busyish over the past few days. I'll be more active in the future.
Who do you think looks worst so far?
Tomasque seems at least somewhat suspicious. Wanting to lynch lurkers and people in the process of being replaced doesn't strike me as terribly useful. Pressure voting someone inactive so they'll defend themselves and give more data is one thing, but
roo can't do that. Plus their stated goals and opinions differ from their voting habits. First they say that
roo shouldn't be lynched, then they say
roo isn't guilty but should be lynched anyways. Plus they only voted after being pressured to do so. I find that last suspicious. A townie's weapon is their vote and doing things belatedly as a concession to an accusation doesn't sit well with me.
As for you,
Notquitethere... I don't know. I think you're either town or refuge in audacity scum, leaning heavily towards the former. And, with only one[or MAYBE two] scum, drawing any real attention to yourself[Positive OR negative] is a very bad idea. I think your No Lynch plan could be helping Kira win indirectly, but I'm not so sure that Kira would come out and suggest a major change of plans. To be entirely honest, my earlier pressure vote on you was mainly to see who else would jump on the bandwagon and if you'd shoot your mouth off defending yourself.