Quickpost before I get to a more stable connection (and everything else like my notes -_- ).
Tiruin's not going to like me for pointing this out, but not being able to be tracked is only a useful ability if you've got something to hide. If that's a fullclaim like she says then she's accidentally admitting to being scum. An immunity to tracking only makes sense if you have an active ability and unless I'm misreading she's claimed two autos.
It's not that 'I don't like you for pointing 'this out'', if I've to ever assume your point (which is very hard to do because its as if your 'not going to like me for pointing this out = this is reasonably what is happening').
It's more 'I don't like how you're utilizing conventional logic in a skewed fashion [skewed = one way out of the many ways of branching paths] in a way that parallels your idea of 'Tirry is scoom', minus
all other methods of rationalizing the context which is furthermore exacerbated by
how you phrase your ideas, word your adjectives, add diction to your verbs, and limit your scope of meaning.'
NQTThis has been a pattern you've had since Day 1 in varying amounts (ie that one representation of others players IN OTHER GAMES in a previous meta-statement? It's one example--but a prominent one...given the context of that one post)
Is that all you can point out?
What is your backing context in this, NQT?
You speak as if this is no conjunction--but a conclusive feat of data. Thus so in a deeper setting when you turn it into a
wording bias. Those subtle indices of how you word something--following the essence or meaning of your post--do not speak well to me due to this nature of...versimilitude.
...Even if you suspect me merely on grounds of skepticism or 'this person may be scum', your backing and follow up lack a lot, in that it doesn't give a holistic enough idea to believe, when I look
in depth at it (which biases my outlook to those you interact with -_-). While I'm aware [now...] of this...Seriously dude. I've seen you pull much more...aesthetically complex variants of receiving ideas from people you communicate with. Why am I primarily getting the idea that you're using superficiality with me? -.- Unless...that's your new schemata for these days ._.
But back to seriousness: Yes you're misreading.
Unless you assume that 'untrackable' = Auto.
Sharpen your point please.
The attitude reminds me of a historical battle I've read--wherein in the surrender of an opposing army in a valley or mountain pass, the victorious officer, unsure of what to do with the survivors, asked his superior--who replied either with a 'spare no man' or 'spare them all'. Yet the middle option was chosen.
Which I feel is being reflected in your attitude here. A bag of mixed signals.
Deus, one thing that raises small alarm bells is that your power appears to be a straight up cop ability. We've seen from the flips that other cops have a nerfed version. Do you mind explaining a bit more about how yours works?
Does
that pertain to seminal data? As in what 'other flips in other BYORs' mean?
Have you asked the most pertinent source (ie The GM, ZU) if his basis is similar to the other BYORs in any pertinent fashion?
In my perspective--taking this game as is, as well as comparison of what powers exist
as is is better than cross-comparison to other games.
When did the idea of questioning Deus in-quote pop up in your thoughts? Have you been planning it the whole day and retroactively acted as-if in order to see if others poke him?
[Also if anyone asks--I did not act N1 due to..not being there to act N1 -.- I believe some few have checked my profile during that time--or at least I assume people did...because if ever this kind of statement is nudged at me, I will not answer as I won't be able to say anything towards it o_O My best answer would be 'due to RL' but I don't want to use that as my defense. ...It's my only defense.]
@Teneb: Other than the notes I posted in my prior...posts, could I ask
here, if you considered that I had thought about that, and that ZU displays all votes in particular [so as not to confirm or deny any abilities or so?]
I honestly did not ask ZU about that certain mechanic [and assumed that my vote would not show...yeah >.>], but that thought popped to me as soon as I saw the votecount [along with 'maybe someone stole or wiped my auto?']
Thus far, however, the massclaim has given a certain index:
Jack: What is NQT referring to here? Given that he's talking to you--which you've given no indication of being blocked today beforehand?. . .
Also, Persus? ...I'm missing something here, aren't I?
@DA: Reasons behind the inspections please? One major thing in me voting you is that lack of detail. It's a pivotal point--why wasn't the backing presented?
@NQT: Why haven't you asked DA
that? :V [...or anyone else doing
so?]
Still a bit lost with certain details. Rereading back...hope the day didn't end yet -.- Please extend. If we're inferring 3 scum--we're at LYLO with 4 town.