Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[10ebbor10]

That won't get you parity. Chances are you'll make the gap worse.

[Kot]

That won't get you parity. Chances are you'll make the gap worse.

It will, because we will have a plane capable of high-alt flight, unlike theirs, and so we'll just win by energyfighting and BnZ.

[tryrar]

That won't get you parity. Chances are you'll make the gap worse.

It will, because we will have a plane capable of high-alt flight, unlike theirs, and so we'll just win by energyfighting and BnZ.

I've PMed sensei about the chanes so we know if we can do them with just a revision, so let's cool it for now.

[Sensei]

Retractable landing gear, canopy cockpit and turbo could all fit into a revision if you get good rolls. Risk of introducing bugs exists.

[10ebbor10]

High explosive fragmentary tracers is a great anti aircraft round.

HEFI is better. HEFI-API-T belts would be golden, but we can't exactly get a proper anti-aircraft belts thanks to the fact our autocannon needs to be recalibrated every time you want to use different round.

I do insist on keeping the tracer in there somewhere.

Treaties are not going to ban hollow points. Not included in any proposed treaty.

It will still suck against their body armor.

Not all their forces use it.

Hesh is plastic explosive and a fuze. No reason we can't develop it sooner.

It's also going to be as useful as HEAT, thanks to the fact they have both spaced armor and slat armor.

It'll do fine in an anti building role.

That won't get you parity. Chances are you'll make the gap worse.

It will, because we will have a plane capable of high-alt flight, unlike theirs, and so we'll just win by energyfighting and BnZ.

Theirs will be more maneuverable, better armed and have better speed due to better aerodynamics.

Stop with the war crime bit for hollow points, it's not something we ever agreed to.

I'm actually against it for moral reasons rather than legal reasons. We needn't become animals to kill animals.

You should be in favor of hollow point ammo then. It kills far faster than normal ammo, and hence is often required to be used while hunting to reduce the animals suffering

Hesh is plastic explosive and a fuze. No reason we can't develop it sooner.

Plastic explosive means Oil cost. We won't be able to field the ammunition as much as we'd want.

Like it's going to coat more than 2 oil.

We're not going to get an airsuperiority fighter out of our revision. Parity, maybe, but nowhere near superiority.

We already have parity, actually. The report says that air performance is similar between the two nations. I'm guessing it's because we have better AA.

Better bomber actually.

Retractable landing gear, canopy cockpit and turbo could all fit into a revision if you get good rolls. Risk of introducing bugs exists.

I propose we do that on the divebomber, not the fighter. It's armament is lighter and the benefit will be more significant even if we design a new fighter.

[andrea]

seems good.

Honestly, I don't think we need to do all that gun restructuring. What is wrong with our guns? canopy turbo and gear are more important.

[10ebbor10]

On that note, I still don't think we need to double down on aircraft.

[tryrar]

seems good.

Honestly, I don't think we need to do all that gun restructuring. What is wrong with our guns? canopy turbo and gear are more important.

I wanted to so we can get rid of that heavy propshaft as well. Oh well, can't get everything you want, so I support just the cockpit, turbo, and landing gear.

Actually, since we'll just need to design a new fighter really to get all I want out of the design, I support 10ebbor's ammo revision as this will help us more this turn.

[Kot]

Divebomber doesn't need to go high, it actually shouldn't. Fighter should. Pop the canopy, turbo and gear on it and you got a very good fighter plane.

[andrea]

I wanted to leave an order

do bombing runs at night. Targets should be painted with flares. However, paint targets with flares even when no bombing run is planned, at least a couple of times per night.

this means that either they respond to every call, wasting time and resources, getting sleep deprived and quite stressed, or they start ignoring them, meaning they won't scatter and take shelter when bombs actually fall.

As for the revision, I am torn. I'll vote tomorrow, if a decision isn't taken by then.

[10ebbor10]

We have no method of navigation at night. Doing nightly bombing runs means bombing random fields.

Edit : On a side note, we're lucky the Moskurgians never designed anything naval. That would allow them to attack the plains.

[Execute/Dumbo.exe]

Would It be possible to make a revision for our shotgun?
I mean, a good pump action shotgun would do well to help in short range battles.

[tryrar]

Would It be possible to make a revision for our shotgun?
I mean, a good pump action shotgun would do well to help in short range battles.

Yeah, it can be done(we never did revise it after stealing it), but I wonder how useful that is compared to our SMG.

[10ebbor10]

It does solve the sidearm problem.

[Execute/Dumbo.exe]

The only sidearm we have is a shoddy pistol that's normally used as a close range backup anyway.