"That's is probably the best course of action. We all live in our own little worlds, examining the same things yet experiencing different realities."
Wish I had such a luxury.
"The dead old men who formulated some of the fundamental frameworks of our modern science made perhaps a rather critical miscalculation."
Damned egotistical alazons the lot of them.
"They sought to remove the scientist themselves from science, to remove subjectivity and birth a system of objective laws that would hence describe a single reality. A single existence."
As if deluded fools have any right to dictate such terms to the universe.
"Yet as science marches onwards to an uncertain future, the cracks are beginning to show. The present, what we value above all seems to have no real meaning, nothing to delineate from the rest of time, or rather the shifting mesh-work of entangled particles from which the illusion we call space-time arises from. Quantum theory in itself begins to contradict what we knew, determinism crumbles to ash amidst its probabilistic model, the ironclad speed of light is undermined by the instant transmission of entangled states. Pseudo-paradoxes arise, and the unification of physics becomes harder and harder. For the classical described one existence, and the quantum another. Like how the ancient idea that the celestial and terrestrial are separate, incapable of meeting, this is yet another dichotomy indicative of a possible flaw requiring correction. It is therefore with such in mind that I subscribe to QBism, at the cost of the objective reality we cling onto. Not that it makes much of a difference to me, my ability is to remove myself from existence, and so the fact that I continue to exist for myself though not for other during that state is rather conclusive that a singular existence as we know it (or alternatively the solidity of logic) is impossible."