Everyone, night 1 I blocked Generally, night 2 I blocked OSG and night 3 I blocked Tiruin. Since Tiruin's trying to push suspicion onto GM, I'd be inclined to think he's town, or at least not the cult leader. Since one of my blocks must have worked, that means that OSG is either town or the cult leader (or could be a cultist if Tiruin's the leader), and Tiruin's either a cultist or the leader. Tiruin
...And to humor you and any assumption henceforth: Given your role of logic here, I'll counter it--given all you can glean from Tiruin in this game, why would she risk herself as a fakeclaim in this instance?
Let's discuss this with visibility and directness, shall we? Accusations of WIFOM aside, your logic is skewed.
Why would you create the speculation that there's an either/or, pertaining to the orange portion? That would give the assumption that I'm willing to risk myself--if a leader--in the workings of a mislynch today. (Cultist = free pawn = 4v3 scenario [Which you vote for me]. Which is very weird explaining my contradiction to your either/or.)
Let's pull your logic:
N1/N2 = Nope.
N3 = Hit Cultist leader, or possibly Tiruin who was cult'd in the last 2 nights, but counting that--then your leader would be one of the N1/N2, presuming the cult...cult'd everyday after.
But in this scenario, its STILL a seven man game
So, I'm the cult leader. I claimed as jailer--though on my part, I know I was jailed (and I would've acted N2, in the least; Your argument, DA, did not encompass a very crucial note :I).
But anyway.
It's like D3 all over again, if that is the case. I wonder on the exact difference where you think I'm a CULTIST and then vote me, instead of broaching purely being a leader, since its a 4v3 scenario using that logic.
In my total perspective: if you were, seriously, the Jailer--you would've had this VERY climactic portion of this time of day (broaching experience, saying that this is one influence leading to...), and you would be pretty aware of the words you use here. Either/or is a test, or in innocuous terms, you poking at a general idea when one who actually has that role would've been more...picky(?), exact seems better. Maybe because you're "deciding" amongst the three you 'jailed', as a plausibility.
It's more interesting that you can draw a conjunctive between OSG and Me, and yet use the notion of Leader and Cultist MAINLY on me (with lacking context as to why. Same goes for your first two other 'jails'). Your 'therefore' broaches only the superficial, and then some.
It's expressively interesting that your first note against me did not include any direct mention of me fakeclaiming. But "in between the words unmentioned," there's that label instead, to draw attention.
Because seriously:
"that means that"
Is this 'all' the meaning present? Or the 'most obvious [to me]' meaning?
Fakeclaim harder, please.
While you may be new to the cult game, this kind of game specifically favors directness instead of certainty.
Since Tiruin's trying to push suspicion onto GM, I'd be inclined to think he's town, or at least not the cult leader.
Also, She. :v
Why is it an either/or case for you, DA? Is this so called jailer being ambivalent at this time?
If I've missed anything, please correct me.
You claimed that you took no action on Night 1 as part of your jailer fake claim. I have no reason to believe it, and no reason to believe you couldn't pre-emptively send in a conversion target in case of being busy.
And you've no reason to even ask about it either. Just assuming. :v
But SOMEHOW all these assumptions end up in a one-sided conclusion, so the logic is left inbetween all your lines there.
This isn't an idiom I'm familiar with.
I ran out of idioms and made my own ._.tl;dr: DA, if you're seriously the jailor, your 'introduction post' lacks a ton of point to it. It's vague fishing.
Author
Topic: Cult Mafia 2 - Game Over! Cult victory! (Read 35312 times)