PFP
Why did you choose to gambit against me?
Random.org chose you
. . .
In the context of Warhammer 40k, do you play the game or know the lore? And do you identify as Eldar? :V
'Tis a very !fun! answer. Because it is reasonable. Despite the efficiency of it.
Everyone, night 1 I blocked Generally, night 2 I blocked OSG and night 3 I blocked Tiruin. Since Tiruin's trying to push suspicion onto GM, I'd be inclined to think he's town, or at least not the cult leader. Since one of my blocks must have worked, that means that OSG is either town or the cult leader (or could be a cultist if Tiruin's the leader), and Tiruin's either a cultist or the leader. Tiruin
...So you're actually the cult leader who is fakeclaiming today, and pretty much lying about what he's saying to advocate a lynch?
This is interesting.
You drop the open notion of the cult leader not doing anything (which would totally make sense in N1 given that I wasn't even present there), and instead provoke, with a direct (and reasonable) bout of logic.
In layman's terms: You're shortening the spear to prod the person right next to you.
...In other words: Dude, if you're town, be serious. Are you exactly that certain of yourself, or do you assume I'm the cult leader without jumping on the most basic fact...that I couldn't have acted N1 (and then building your idea from that statement, connecting it probably to my Jailer claim dot dot ellipsis...adding on conclusive data, OTHER than justifying your own Jailing with a lack of direct -respect- to your target)?
EveryoneAlso why is everyone saying I'm suspicious what is so suspicious that I do.
I'm quickposting, Me, apologies :/
The suspicious note (which I ask anyone to counter check my memory due to lack of time to make a response), is that you were called out on your earlier day-end voting. You did it -once more-, and currently, there's a lack of detail.
Now this 'lack' is subtle. A newbie generally does that. But this 'lack' in your condition, inferred from a generality, pertains to...a lack of non-ambiguity in regards to your actions. While a newbie does make mistakes 'against the rulebook', they learn once-over.
You repeated this, yesterday, without any context as to your vote except the name of your vote, and the PRECISE time which it was given.
Analogy in simplicity: Why did you vote someone right next to the end of the day? Again? Like, again-again?Coincidence may linger on the benefit of the doubt, in analyzing your earlier end-dayvote, but a second time in a row EXPRESSIVELY without context despite being called out (with context, based on general recall, someone please recheck)...is suspicious.
Which is why I jailed you.
Now calling out N1--I did not act during then, so there is at most 1 other cultist advocate present IF Gen.Me is the leader...Excuse my textual sarcasm. :v
Tying the vote at the last second for arguably minor reasons is generally seen as a Very Bad Thing.
...Summed up here, but also that you can perform the...same mistake twice. Like, mirror-image specifically.