Unless you are the Islamic scholar who pinned Muhammad death on a Jew, i have no quarrel with you.
I won't deny I am not within the realm of possibility to be as a fact an ancient Islamic scholar operating out of a time traveling kebab van going by the name of Dr. Hussein
Because that is what I am not
The only reason i extracted that part of your original post is because i heavily suspected that if there was a claim about Muhammad death not being natural, it would surely be pinned on a Jew, and hey, what a surprise, my suspicion was correct.
Shit wasn't natural, any less than you could say a death by neurotoxin is natural because suffocation is a natural process
As for the validity of the claim ("truth trumps", heh 
) , well, i guess for people who believe in flying horses and talking ants, believing Muhammad was poisoned to death by a Jew 3 years prior to his actual death using a poison not known to science even after 1500 years is not that unreasonable.
He ate from the same poison that killed his companion who ate it at higher doses. His friend ate more of the poisoned lamb - he dies almost immediately. Muhammed ate less of the lamb, the symptoms afflict him until and leading to premature death. This is hardly rocket science.
"Using a poison not known to science" - """Science""" does not know what poison killed Umar, Ali, Artaxerxes III and IV, Hui, Muhammed and so on, we do not know what poisons the likes of Locusta used even in spite of 2000 years of science and an interest in some of the most powerful people to have ever walked the Earth. Off the top of my head the only famous poison deaths of the ancient world we know about are Socrates and Cleopatra, who both committed suicide and had no need to disguise the poison from themselves. This is not exactly a statement of validity, especially considering the most effective poison is one undetectable and one easily available.
The alternative narrative is believing in the word of an anonymous wikipedia editor sourcing their information from an interpretation of the Quran dating from the late 19th century in Germany from a failed prospective Rabbi, ignoring all of the Hadiths from historiographers or the accounts from the Companions of Muhammed. Why lol?
I'll have to call Dr. Hussein to figure out how the ancient scholars had the ability to predict the modern geopolitics and identity politics of the modern world 1,300 years in advance
Why do you keep typing like that? Is that some new cultural reference I've missed or are you having a stroke?
W E A R E B U I L D I N G A R E L I G I O N
W E A R E B U I L D I N G A B R A N D
W E A R E T H E O N L Y O N E S T O T U R N T O
W H E N Y O U R C A S T L E S T U R N T O S A N D
helper, not a sex slave
so yeah.
Mother of God
Also notable is that all of J's m8s left him cos they didn't want to get Roman'd whilst his female converts stayed at the foot of the Rood during the Passion
And if we're getting all semantic, helper does not indicate any power or lack thereof, a supplicant to a helper has the helper in a position of power, a doctor is holding all the info and skill, or on the other end a general assistant to a specialist has a command chain e.t.c.
Poll
71 (27.7%)
Author
Topic: Railgun and Spirituality Discussion (Read 681870 times)