Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[pisskop]

I dont believe you 'got it wrong'  Thats a glaring mistake.

[Cheeetar]

Yep. A mistake is getting it wrong. The flavour is a non-issue, anyway. The primary thing making you scum right now is your massive overreaction and desperate attempts to pressure me into revealing who the medium is.

(Thanks for the tip, Flabort & helper. It's what I needed to crack this case wide open!)

[UXLZ]

That's pretty lazy. Why are you waiting for notquitethere to provide you leads?

Yeah, I realised that wasn't the most productive thing to do, so I started looking into Pisskop shortly afterward.

He's had plenty of time since replacing in. He's had some of Day 1, all of Night 1, and started Day 2. The grace period for being a replacement has passed.

Why aren't you voting for him then?

Is that how long the grace period lasts for? I didn't know there were any formal 'timelines.'
Then again, I'll admit I tend to altogether be too lenient. How long would you suggest a 'grace period' last for?
Why does the night count towards the time?

I'm not voting for him, because, looking back, ZU hasn't really been acting all that strange (excepting the 'not understanding the way the Guardian works' thing.)

It's notquitethere. flabort made it completely obvious that that was who he was talking about.

I know that, and so does everyone else (probably), but the question was directed at Pisskopp, who doesn't seem to read other's posts very much.

-sigh-... Didn't want to have to do this. Sorry if this is irritating, but I'd like for pisskop to actually notice my darn question.

Yo Pisskop, did you ever get around to telling us who the scum team were? You seemed pretty confident here. I've looked through your posts after I asked for that, and I didn't notice anything. Did I miss it?

As it sits, if Tiruin is scum, I figure Ive got the other 2 clinched.  If she isnt I have three people in mind too.

[pisskop]

I noticed your question, UXLZ.  Its just redundent to the game.  Look at my reads


Cheeetar, Where did you claim exactly?  Please quote where you claimed enchanter in this game.

[Cheeetar]

Welp. I don't want you idiots killing the vigilante (whose townie behaviour has by now convinced me the silliness earlier to game start was just that and nothing more), so I'm going to vote for TheDarkStar, whose resurgence to activity has done nothing to convince me that his jump on the bandwagon was not ill intentioned and poorly thought out.

Unvote Pisskop. Vote TheDarkStar. Seeing as I have two votes, the votes are now tied. Your move, guys. You have just over 1 hour to make it.

[pisskop]

hunh.  I can see why I missed it.


unvote

for now

[Cheeetar]

Because he's full of it.
  Im sure others will follow.

  Cheeetar, I suggest you claim or name names.

  Youve done nothing but push my lynch and and try to discredit me.
  Where are your other reads?  Your scumhunting?
You sending me PMs telling me how to act and voting me at the same time

What happened to your case, Pisskop? Are you going to abandon it so quickly?

[Jim Groovester]

Yep, that's a hasty retreat when you were so confident people would follow you in voting Cheeetar.

[Deus Asmoth]

Pisskop, I'm inclined to agree with Cheeetar about Jim most likely being town at the moment. Where was Cheeetar role fishing?

[Toaster]

Still not 100% healthy, but I'll try to get something out.

Tiruin:

Toaster did nothing or was busy on Survival last night (was info passed onto me, I shan't tell whom--I didn't start the conversation though with that person)

This is consistent, yes.  That said, I don't understand the rest of this post.


Cheeetar:

Toaster, what are your current top 3 scum picks?

I acknowledge your question, and will answer it when I can parse the D2 data.

Yep. A mistake is getting it wrong. The flavour is a non-issue, anyway. The primary thing making you scum right now is your massive overreaction and desperate attempts to pressure me into revealing who the medium is.

It seems to be a non-issue only when it doesn't help you any.


Pisskop:

  Despite the mad rush to vote me, there's not going to be a lynch of me today.

That's a bold statement right there.  I haven't seen confidence like that since Webadict.


Also, I am all for different people hunting in different styles, but there's something to be said for clarity.  You're not going to convince people of your case if no one understands your case.


So... let me see if I've got the Cliff's Notes of the N1 and friends argument right:

ToonyMan, human War Vet, Flabort, human vig, and Mastahcheese, Dopp Observant Guard, are all dead.  All three have bullet wounds.  Toony also has claw marks.

Pisskop and Deus claim to be involved as well; Pisskop watching Toony and Deus guarding Pisskop.  Their claims seem to corroborate each other, and I believe match PMed target choices in the night.

Cheeetar claims to have been contacted by Flabort via an unnamed Medium.  This claimant says that Pisskop's flavor claim is inconsistent.  Then Cheeetar says he just misread it.

During all of this most other cases have fallen by the wayside.

Am I missing anything?


Also, a pair of suspects:

Tiruin, if I'm not mistaken, hasn't made a single accusation all game.  Sure, she's having net issues, but she's also posted enough that I don't find that a sufficient reason any more.

Scripten is pinging my gut somehow, but I have yet to narrow down why.  Further reading is required.

[Jim Groovester]

Pisskop watching Toony and Deus guarding Pisskop.

pisskop initially claimed to watch ToonyMan. He later claimed to follow ToonyMan, after he was pressed about his results that were inconsistent with his claimed action.

[Cheeetar]

Cheeetar claims to have been contacted by Flabort via an unnamed Medium.  This claimant says that Pisskop's flavor claim is inconsistent.  Then Cheeetar says he just misread it.

Flabort believed the flavour claim was inconsistent, I just improperly phrased his complaint. This is my bad, not his.

[Tiruin]

Updoot: PC problems! x_x
Will be back on a public PC in a half day ._.
Got my notes though!

^{And for some reason, the semantics checker does not red-underline the word 'tho'...}

[Tiruin]

Tiruin, if I'm not mistaken, hasn't made a single accusation all game.  Sure, she's having net issues, but she's also posted enough that I don't find that a sufficient reason any more.

Yeah, about that
I've been looking back and forming queries on things--pisskop seems to be drawing quite the crowd, given his method of wording and statements; the appended form of PMs also gives in a new facet to the game which...pretty much dismantles most of the gameplay (because its a case of 'we play lynchman in the town plaza at day, while each person may speak to each other in the underground tunnels anytime')...meaning that the PMs provide an ulterior form of communication which, in cases of due suspicion to some people or certain others, would exclude or include many, many recipients...in what would otherwise be posts in the public thread (ie This thread.)

Then putting the reads on certainly...everyone else. There are claims falling everywhere--mostly through PMs; I mean, really. I even got a Telepath report in PMs (of whom I am not telling for obvious reasons :v [and they never said to...but I didn't ask either...])! Noting the evidence of...personal claiming behind-the-scenes, the PM factor plays a giant role in how everyone here acts in the thread.
...Problem is, that I haven't even played the PM game at all! >_>
Counting back, noting the reads and all else, there's a lacking forcefulness or impact which most of the players enact. The previous days have revolved around focus on one or certain others--especially due to this gambit fiasco which came up--and has been currently orbiting those ideas as a topic for discussion.
The fun thing is that the deviances towards those discussions come in...understandings of roles, other than provocative or declarative statements giving an idea of alignment or personal stances. Though I believe that's more my personal read than the general happenstance, as I base my reads more along attitude than semantics or otherwise.
...Which means that many, many people have taken towards focusing on...the technical lurker or absentee than otherwise is the norm, in my book: other than risk a case of logic--either the accusations have gone to the PM-game behind the scenes, or that I'm really seeing a lack of initiative here (less so, being the reliance on power roles). ._.

[notquitethere]

Tiruin, pointing out people's lack of cases doesn't help if you don't put forward a case yourself. Who is scum?

Pisskop, from how people were trying to get you lynched and your stated claims, I'm reluctant to read you as scum (why would scum follow the person they intended to kill? As an alibi?) But your latest OMGUS-style flailing is deeply suspicious. You apparently have scum picks, why aren't you pressing a case?

All, on a train now. Will be home to sift through things soon.