This is an English forum btw. I'm not really sure what language you're speaking because none of what you wrote makes sense grammatically, semantically or logically. Did a monkey jump on your typewriter?
It's funny that given how utterly unconcerned with people's lives the US is the more "stable" in the US views get, the fewer people die.
Few people die because of US foreign policy you're saying? So stability as the west sees it is valid? It's really hard to decipher what you're intending to say. Though if that is a correct assessment there are numerous counter-examples. For instance, Bush held up Uribe-era Colombia as a force for stability and a model democracy in Latin America, when they in fact threaten and bomb their neighboring countries, have an insanely violent secret police, and have the worst human rights record of any post-2000 Latin American nation. They lead the world in murders of trade union members. Like, literally lead the world: many years, more than 50% of
worldwide murders of trade union representatives are in Colombia. But they're a "democratizing force for stability" because they suck GW Bush dick. They get $1 billion a year in US military aid and were actively encouraged to pick fights with neighboring countries because that promotes US interests. Their terrible human rights record isn't even an issue.
It's also funny how a linguist like Chomsky is downright Orwellian in his use of creeping language
Example?
The man is a liar, plain and simple.
You should have ample examples then.
I remember his movie was a dark comedy, a terrifying example of how someone's ideals corrupted him.
Which film exactly? As far as I can tell there have been 2-3 interview films and docos he appeared in since 1990. No actual "movie".