Okay, slept on this and have had time to think it over. Apologies to you, Cheetar, for losing my cool. It's been a rough week IRL.
I'm not blaming you for not changing your vote- merely pointing out that it was not inevitable for Flabort to have been lynched at the time. There was sufficient time for a change of minds (that did not occur.)
The changing of minds did not occur because there was no real reason that I (or we, if we are to assume) could see at the time to switch votes. My case was built on the same foundation, that there was enough time for NQT to make a better case for why we shouldn't lynch Flabort. When he posted his explanations for not doing so, however, I decided that they satisfied me.
Not sure what you mean. Sorry.
I explained in response to the previous quote. You were using the exact same foundation to build on your case on me that I had used to begin my case on NQT. However, you were also saying that me building that case was scummy and, it appeared, working from the assumption that I didn't want Flabort lynched, which is untrue for me.
It's like you're blaming me for not sheeping NQT when NQT has said himself that he hadn't pushed his case hard enough.
Thank you for addressing some of Flabort's concerns. As they were Flabort's, I can't exactly do much to argue them now that you've answered them- I just wanted you to at least respond to them.
I'll be honest here. I didn't really see any of that as valid enough to respond to. The whole case reeked of having been fabricated by scum. In hindsight, it was not, but there was no way for me to know that at the time.
Also, TheDarkStar has legit made me lose my mind. I
never said I didn't like posting Day 1 reads. I said that they are often wrong and are not as useful as later reads, but they can move the game state forward, so they are pro-town in general. Can't really respond to anything else in there since none of it has anything to do with the current day. (What's with the stalling?)