Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 136

Author Topic: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.  (Read 208629 times)

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1680 on: February 07, 2017, 08:43:25 pm »
Quote from: Helgoland on February 07, 2017, 08:21:06 pm
Kinda related: https://warisboring.com/iran-and-russia-are-apparently-fighting-each-other-in-syria-6f9d79b911da#.syfvxymjv

And apparently Assad is selling his country (bits of it anyway) to Iran, and the Syrian regieme is a lot less stable than I realized.
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1681 on: February 07, 2017, 08:52:09 pm »
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1682 on: February 08, 2017, 07:07:02 pm »
Logged

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1683 on: February 09, 2017, 12:22:36 pm »
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1684 on: February 09, 2017, 01:21:59 pm »
Eh, bombing your allies on purpose can hardly be classified as passive aggressive
Logged

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1685 on: February 10, 2017, 05:07:32 am »
Quote from: Loud Whispers on February 09, 2017, 01:21:59 pm
Eh, bombing your allies on purpose can hardly be classified as passive aggressive

Well, bombing them "accidentally" would be no?
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Sergarr

  • Bay Watcher
  • (9) airheaded baka (9)
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1686 on: February 14, 2017, 04:53:30 pm »
Logged
._.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1687 on: February 14, 2017, 05:05:22 pm »
Hard to tell if he's showing off a little (most likely not, given the situation), but yeah, that's pretty badass.
Logged

ggamer

  • Bay Watcher
  • Reach Heaven through Violence
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1688 on: February 14, 2017, 05:29:02 pm »
Quote from: Sergarr on February 14, 2017, 04:53:30 pm
A wild dual-AK-wielder has been spotted!

reminds me of the FSA fighter in that one webm that always gets passed around 4 chan; he stands up in a street hip firing some big fucking machine gun, and gets a dozen shots off before he gets double tapped by some former ba'athist fucking commando or something down the street
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1689 on: February 14, 2017, 06:52:22 pm »
Quote from: Sheb on February 10, 2017, 05:07:32 am
Quote from: Loud Whispers on February 09, 2017, 01:21:59 pm
Eh, bombing your allies on purpose can hardly be classified as passive aggressive
Well, bombing them "accidentally" would be no?
There's nothing friendly about friendly fire
Logged

Strife26

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1690 on: February 14, 2017, 07:39:31 pm »
Anyone firing an intermediate cartridge rifle without a stock is an idiot, with almost no exceptions.
Logged
Even the avatars expire eventually.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1691 on: February 15, 2017, 12:33:10 am »
Quote from: Strife26 on February 14, 2017, 07:39:31 pm
Anyone firing an intermediate cartridge rifle without a stock is an idiot, with almost no exceptions.

How come? Just wondering. Other than possibly balance issues and likely control issues. Does look a little odd for them to have no back portion, or stock if you will.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2017, 12:36:45 am by smjjames »
Logged

Strife26

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1692 on: February 15, 2017, 12:43:15 am »
The balance and control issues are pretty much it. Even hitting something with a machine pistol firing a comparatively tiny round is an impressive feat. Stockless rifles are for people who want to trade ease of carry for something that's almost entirely useless.
Logged
Even the avatars expire eventually.

Helgoland

  • Bay Watcher
  • No man is an island.
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1693 on: February 15, 2017, 06:07:38 pm »
Well, suppressive fire maybe?
Logged
The Bay12 postcard club
Quote from: MetalSlimeHunt on December 28, 2014, 03:28:43 am
Arguably he's already a progressive, just one in the style of an enlightened Kaiser.
Quote from: Wolfhunter107 on May 26, 2017, 08:10:14 pm
I'm going to do the smart thing here and disengage. This isn't a hill I paticularly care to die on.

smjjames

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Let's go back to Iraq, now without WMDs Thread. About the IS(IS) threat.
« Reply #1694 on: February 15, 2017, 06:15:59 pm »
Quote from: Helgoland on February 15, 2017, 06:07:38 pm
Well, suppressive fire maybe?

I'm sure you still want to have solid control of it so you don't accidentially hit the people you're fire-suppressing for.

It looked mostly like showing off to me honestly, rather than any tactical move.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 136
« previous next »